The Democratizing Effects of Multilateral Organizations: A Cautionary Note on the WTO


Autoria(s): Elsig, Manfred
Data(s)

2013

Resumo

The field of international relations has been obsessed with democracy and democratization and its effects on international cooperation for a long time. More recently, research has turned its focus on how international organizations enhance democracy. This article contributes to this debate and applies a prominent liberal framework to study the ‘outside-in’ effects of the World Trade Organization. The article offers a critical reading of democratization through IO membership. It provides for an assessment of the dominant framework put forward by Keohane et al. (2009). In doing so, it develops a set of empirical strategies to test conjectured causal mechanisms with respect to the WTO, and illustrates the potential application by drawing on selected empirical evidence from trade politics. Finally, it proposes a number of analytical revisions to the liberal framework and outlines avenues for future research.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://boris.unibe.ch/49448/1/Elsig_WTR.pdf

Elsig, Manfred (2013). The Democratizing Effects of Multilateral Organizations: A Cautionary Note on the WTO. World trade review, 12(3), pp. 487-507. Cambridge University Press 10.1017/S147474561200050X <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S147474561200050X>

doi:10.7892/boris.49448

info:doi:10.1017/S147474561200050X

urn:issn:1474-7456

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Cambridge University Press

Relação

http://boris.unibe.ch/49448/

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess

Fonte

Elsig, Manfred (2013). The Democratizing Effects of Multilateral Organizations: A Cautionary Note on the WTO. World trade review, 12(3), pp. 487-507. Cambridge University Press 10.1017/S147474561200050X <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S147474561200050X>

Palavras-Chave #340 Law #380 Commerce, communications & transportation #320 Political science
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

PeerReviewed