Closure of a patent foramen ovale with a device does not offer a greater benefit than medical therapy alone for the prevention of recurrent cerebrovascular events
Data(s) |
01/02/2013
|
---|---|
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador |
http://boris.unibe.ch/9474/1/Mattle2013_EvidBasedMed.pdf Mattle, Heinrich P.; Mono, Marie-Luise (2013). Closure of a patent foramen ovale with a device does not offer a greater benefit than medical therapy alone for the prevention of recurrent cerebrovascular events. Evidence-based medicine, 18(1), pp. 34-35. Philadelphia, Pa.: American College of Physicians 10.1136/eb-2012-100736 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2012-100736> doi:10.7892/boris.9474 info:doi:10.1136/eb-2012-100736 info:pmid:22782919 urn:issn:1356-5524 |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
American College of Physicians |
Relação |
http://boris.unibe.ch/9474/ |
Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Fonte |
Mattle, Heinrich P.; Mono, Marie-Luise (2013). Closure of a patent foramen ovale with a device does not offer a greater benefit than medical therapy alone for the prevention of recurrent cerebrovascular events. Evidence-based medicine, 18(1), pp. 34-35. Philadelphia, Pa.: American College of Physicians 10.1136/eb-2012-100736 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/eb-2012-100736> |
Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion NonPeerReviewed |