Two-Phase Frictional Pressure Drop and Flow Boiling Heat Transfer for R245fa in a 2.32-mm Tube


Autoria(s): Tibiriçá, Cristiano Bigonha; Ribatski, Gherhardt
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

07/04/2014

07/04/2014

01/11/2011

Resumo

Experimental two-phase frictional pressure drop and flow boiling heat transfer results are presented for a horizontal 2.32-mm ID stainless-steel tube using R245fa as working fluid. The frictional pressure drop data was obtained under adiabatic and diabatic conditions. Experiments were performed for mass velocities ranging from 100 to 700 kg m−2 s−1 , heat flux from 0 to 55 kW m−2 , exit saturation temperatures of 31 and 41◦C, and vapor qualities from 0.10 to 0.99. Pressures drop gradients and heat transfer coefficients ranging from 1 to 70 kPa m−1 and from 1 to 7 kW m−2 K−1 were measured. It was found that the heat transfer coefficient is a strong function of the heat flux, mass velocity, and vapor quality. Five frictional pressure drop predictive methods were compared against the experimental database. The Cioncolini et al. (2009) method was found to work the best. Six flow boiling heat transfer predictive methods were also compared against the present database. Liu and Winterton (1991), Zhang et al. (2004), and Saitoh et al. (2007) were ranked as the best methods. They predicted the experimental flow boiling heat transfer data with an average error around 19%.

Proc. 05/60031-0, 06/52089-1, 07/53950-5 - FAPESP

Identificador

Heat Transfer Engineering, Philadelphia, v. 32, n. 13-14, p. 1139-1149, 2011

1521-0537

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/44395

10.1080/01457632.2011.562725

http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=57da9617-775d-4e72-95bf-83160ea6e0a6%40sessionmgr4004&vid=2&hid=4209

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Oxfordshire

Relação

Heat Transfer Engineering

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright Taylor and Francis

Palavras-Chave #FRICTIONAL resistance (Hydrodynamics) #ADIABATIC demagnetization #FLUID dynamics #RESEARCH #EBULLITION #HEAT flux #VAPOR density #ERROR rates
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion