SEM analysis and push-out bond strength of fiberglass posts luted with different cements of glass-ionomer in humid environment: pilot test


Autoria(s): Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo; Vidotti, Hugo Alberto; Valle, Accacio Lins do; Pamato, Saulo; Ghizoni, Janaina Salomon; Honório, Heitor Marques; Lorenzoni, Fabio Cesar
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

11/12/2013

11/12/2013

01/05/2013

Resumo

The objective of this study was to evaluate the push-out bond strength of fiberglass resin reinforced bonded with five ionomer cements. Also, the interface between cement and dentin was inspected by means of SEM. Fifty human canines were chose after rigorous scrutiny process, endodontically treated and divided randomly into five groups (n = 3) according to cement tested: Group I – Ionoseal (VOCO), Group II – Fugi I (GC), Group III – Fugi II Improved (GC), Group IV – Rely X Luting 2 (3M ESPE), Group V – Ketac Cem (3M ESPE). The post-space was prepared to receive a fiberglass post, which was tried before cementation process. No dentin or post surface pretreatment was carried out. After post bonding, all roots were cross-sectioned to acquire 3 thin-slices (1 mm) from three specific regions of tooth (cervical, medium and apical). A Universal test machine was used to carry out the push-out test with cross-head speed set to 0.5mm/mim. All failed specimens were observed under optical microscope to identify the failure mode. Representative specimens from each group was inspected under SEM. The data were analyzed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene’s tests and by two-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s port hoc test at a significance level of 5%. It was compared the images obtained for determination of types of failures more occurred in different levels. SEM inspection displayed that all cements filled the space between post and dentin, however, some imperfections such bubles and voids were noticed in all groups in some degree of extension. The push-out bond strength showed that cement Ketac Cem presented significant higher results when compared to the Ionoseal (P = 0.02). There were no statistical significant differences among other cements.

Identificador

Journal of Research in Dentistry, Tubarão, v. 1, n. 1, p. 83-90, May/June 2013

2317-5907

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/43647

http://www.portaldeperiodicos.unisul.br/index.php/JR_Dentistry/article/view/1363/1084

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

UNISUL

Tubarão

Relação

Journal of Research in Dentistry

Direitos

openAccess

UNISUL

Palavras-Chave #ionomer glass cements #dental pins #scanning electronic microscopy #CIMENTOS DE IONÔMEROS DE VIDRO #PINOS DENTÁRIOS #MICROSCOPIA ELETRÔNICA DE VARREDURA
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion