Low Bone Mineral Density in Middle-Aged Breast Cancer Survivors: Prevalence and Associated Factors


Autoria(s): Conde, Delio Marques; Costa-Paiva, Lucia; Martinez, Edson Zangiacomi; Pinto-Neto, Aarao Mendes
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

21/10/2013

21/10/2013

2012

Resumo

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD) and associated factors in middle-aged breast cancer survivors (BCS). Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 70 BCS of 45-65 years of age undergoing complete oncology treatment. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with low BMD (osteopenia and osteoporosis taken together as a single group). Results: The mean age of participants was 53.2 +/- 5.9 years. BMD was low at the femoral neck in 28.6% of patients and at the lumbar spine in 45.7%. Body mass index <= 30 kg/m(2) (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-11.3) and postmenopausal status (OR adjusted 20.42; 95% CI 2.0-201.2) were associated with low BMD at the lumbar spine. Femoral neck measurements, age > 50 years (OR 3.41; 95% CI 1.0-11.6), and time since diagnosis > 50 months (OR adjusted 3.34; 95% CI 1.0-11.3) increased the likelihood of low BMD. Conclusion: These findings show that low BMD is common in middle-aged BCS. Factors were identified that may affect BMD in BCS and should be considered when implementing strategies to minimize bone loss in middle-aged women with breast cancer.

Identificador

BREAST CARE, BASEL, v. 7, n. 2, supl. 1, Part 1, pp. 121-125, OCT, 2012

1661-3791

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/35384

10.1159/000337763

http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000337763

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

KARGER

BASEL

Relação

BREAST CARE

Direitos

closedAccess

Copyright KARGER

Palavras-Chave #BREAST CANCER #MENOPAUSE #BONE MASS #OSTEOPOROSIS #MIDDLE-AGED WOMEN #POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN #FRACTURE RISK #ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY #OSTEOPOROSIS #HEALTH #MANAGEMENT #TRIAL #MASS #ONCOLOGY #OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion