Diaphragmatic Breathing Training Program Improves Abdominal Motion During Natural Breathing in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial


Autoria(s): Yamaguti, Wellington P.; Claudino, Renata C.; Neto, Alberto P.; Chammas, Maria C.; Gomes, Andrea C.; Salge, Joao M.; Moriya, Henrique Takachi; Cukier, Alberto; Carvalho, Celso R.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

05/11/2013

05/11/2013

2012

Resumo

Yamaguti WP, Claudino RC, Neto AP, Chammas MC, Gomes AC, Salge TM, Moriya HT, Cukier A, Carvalho CR. Diaphragmatic breathing training program improves abdominal motion during natural breathing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:571-7. Objective: To investigate the effects of a diaphragmatic breathing training program (DBTP) on thoracoabdominal motion and functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: Academic medical center. Participants: Subjects (N=30; forced expiratory volume in Is, 4270 +/- 13% predicted) were randomly allocated to either a training group (TG) or a control group (CG). Interventions: Subjects in the TG completed a 4-week supervised DBTP (3 individualized weekly sessions), while those in the CG received their usual care. Main Outcome Measures: Effectiveness was assessed by amplitude of the rib cage to abdominal motion ratio (RC/ABD ratio) (primary outcome) and diaphragmatic mobility (secondary outcome). The RC/ABD ratio was measured using respiratory inductive plethysmography during voluntary diaphragmatic breathing and natural breathing. Diaphragmatic mobility was measured by ultrasonography. A 6-minute walk test and health-related quality of life were also evaluated. Results: Immediately after the 4-week DBTP, the TG showed a greater abdominal motion during natural breathing quantified by a reduction in the RC/ABD ratio when compared with the CG (F=8.66; P<.001). Abdominal motion during voluntary diaphragmatic breathing after the intervention was also greater in the TG than in the CG (F=4.11; P<.05). The TG showed greater diaphragmatic mobility after the 4-week DBTP than did the CG (F=15.08; P<.001). An improvement in the 6-minute walk test and in health-related quality of life was also observed in the TG. Conclusions: DBTP for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease induced increased diaphragm participation during natural breathing, resulting in an improvement in functional capacity.

Identificador

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, PHILADELPHIA, v. 93, n. 4, supl. 4, Part 1-2, pp. 571-577, APR, 2012

0003-9993

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/41684

10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.026

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.026

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC

PHILADELPHIA

Relação

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION

Direitos

closedAccess

Copyright W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC

Palavras-Chave #BREATHING EXERCISES #DIAPHRAGM #EXERCISE TOLERANCE #PULMONARY DISEASE #CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE #QUALITY OF LIFE #RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL #REHABILITATION #MINIMAL IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE #AIR-FLOW OBSTRUCTION #6-MINUTE WALK TEST #HEALTH-STATUS #SEVERE COPD #DYSPNEA #GUIDELINES #EMPHYSEMA #MOBILITY #PATTERN #REHABILITATION #SPORT SCIENCES
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion