Applying the National Institute for Clinical Excellence criteria to patients treated with the Genous (TM) Bio-engineered R stent (TM): a sub-study of the e-HEALING (Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth) worldwide registry


Autoria(s): Klomp, Margo; Damman, Peter; Beijk, Marcel A. M.; Silber, Sigmund; Grisold, Manfred; Ribeiro, Expedito E.; Suryapranata, Harry; Wojcik, Jaroslaw; Sim, Kui Hian; Tijssen, Jan G. P.; de Winter, Robbert J.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

05/11/2013

05/11/2013

2012

Resumo

The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of bare-metal stents (BMS) in non-complex lesions with a low risk of restenosis (diameter a parts per thousand yen3 mm and lesion length a parts per thousand currency sign15 mm) and the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) in more complex lesions with a high risk of restenosis (diameter < 3.0 mm or lesion length > 15 mm). However, the guidelines were created based on studies evaluating BMS and DES only. We performed an analysis of patients undergoing non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention with the novel endothelial cell capturing stent (ECS). The ECS is coated with CD34(+) antibodies that attract circulating endothelial progenitor cells to the stent surface, thereby accelerating the endothelialization of the stented area. We analyzed all patients enrolled in the worldwide e-HEALING registry that met the NICE criteria for either low-risk or high-risk lesions and were treated with a parts per thousand yen1 ECS. The main study outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 12-month follow-up, defined as the composite of cardiac death or MI and target vessel revascularization (TVR). A total of 4,241 patients were assessed in the current analysis. At 12-month follow-up, TVF occurred in 7.0% of the patients with low-risk lesions and in 8.8% of the patients with high-risk lesions (p = 0.045). When evaluating the diabetic patients versus the non-diabetic patients per risk group, no significant differences were found in TVF, MI or TVR in either risk group. The ECS shows good clinical outcomes in lesions carrying either a high or a low risk of restenosis according to the NICE guidelines with comparable rates of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. The TVF rate with ECS was slightly higher in patients with high-risk lesions, driven by higher clinically driven TLR. The risk of restenosis with ECS in patients carrying high-risk lesions needs to be carefully considered relative to other risks associated with DES. Furthermore, the presence of diabetes mellitus did not influence the incidence of TVF in either risk group.

OrbusNeich Medical BV

OrbusNeich Medical BV

OrbusNeich Medical BV, The Netherlands

OrbusNeich Medical BV, The Netherlands

Identificador

HEART AND VESSELS, NEW YORK, v. 27, n. 4, supl. 2, Part 3, pp. 360-369, JUL, 2012

0910-8327

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/41103

10.1007/s00380-011-0167-8

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00380-011-0167-8

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

SPRINGER

NEW YORK

Relação

HEART AND VESSELS

Direitos

closedAccess

Copyright SPRINGER

Palavras-Chave #PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION #NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EXCELLENCE #ENDOTHELIAL PROGENITOR CELLS #RESTENOSIS #PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION #SIROLIMUS-ELUTING STENT #CELL CAPTURING STENT #TAXUS LIBERTE STENT #DIABETES-MELLITUS #SINGLE-CENTER #SLOW-RELEASE #HIGH-RISK #ARTERY LESIONS #PLACEMENT #CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS #PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion