Cediranib Plus FOLFOX/CAPOX Versus Placebo Plus FOLFOX/CAPOX in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Study (HORIZON II)


Autoria(s): Hoff, Paulo M.; Hochhaus, Andreas; Pestalozzi, Bernhard C.; Tebbutt, Niall C.; Li, Jin; Kim, Tae Won; Koynov, Krassimir D.; Kurteva, Galina; Pinter, Tamas; Cheng, Ying; van Eyll, Brigitte; Pike, Laura; Fielding, Anitra; Robertson, Jane D.; Saunders, Mark P.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

30/09/2013

30/09/2013

2012

Resumo

Purpose Cediranib is a highly potent inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling with activity against all three VEGF receptors. HORIZON II [Cediranib (AZD2171, RECENTIN) in Addition to Chemotherapy Versus Placebo Plus Chemotherapy in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer] assessed infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin/capecitabine and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX/CAPOX) with or without cediranib in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods Eligible patients were initially randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive cediranib (20 or 30 mg per day) or placebo plus FOLFOX/CAPOX. In an early analysis of this and two other cediranib studies (HORIZON I [Cediranib Plus FOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX6 in Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer] and HORIZON III [Cediranib Plus FOLFOX6 Versus Bevacizumab Plus FOLFOX6 in Patients With Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer]), the 20-mg dose met the predefined criteria for continuation. Subsequent patients were randomly assigned 2: 1 to the cediranib 20 mg or placebo arms. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were coprimary end points. Results In all, 860 patients received cediranib 20 mg (n = 502) or placebo (n = 358). The addition of cediranib to FOLFOX/CAPOX resulted in PFS prolongation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = .0121; median PFS, 8.6 months for cediranib v 8.3 months for placebo) but had no impact on OS (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.12; P = .5707; median OS, 19.7 months for cediranib v 18.9 months for placebo). There were no significant differences in the secondary end points of objective response rate, duration of response, or liver resection rate. Median chemotherapy dose-intensity was decreased by approximately 10% in patients treated with cediranib. Adverse events (AEs) associated with cediranib were manageable. Conclusion Addition of cediranib 20 mg to FOLFOX/CAPOX resulted in a modest PFS prolongation, but no significant difference in OS. The cediranib AE profile was consistent with those from previous studies. Because of the lack of improvement in OS, cediranib plus an oxaliplatin-based regimen cannot be recommended as a treatment for patients with mCRC. J Clin Oncol 30:3596-3603. (C) 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Identificador

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, ALEXANDRIA, v. 30, n. 29, pp. 3596-3603, OCT 10, 2012

0732-183X

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/33822

10.1200/JCO.2012.42.6031

http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.6031

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

ALEXANDRIA

Relação

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Direitos

closedAccess

Copyright AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY

Palavras-Chave #OXALIPLATIN-BASED CHEMOTHERAPY #FACTOR RECEPTOR INHIBITOR #1ST-LINE TREATMENT #CLINICAL-TRIALS #FLUOROURACIL #LEUCOVORIN #COMBINATION #THERAPY #ONCOLOGY
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion