The EXTRIP (EXtracorporeal TReatments In Poisoning) workgroup: Guideline methodology


Autoria(s): Lavergne, Valery; Nolin, Thomas D.; Hoffman, Robert S.; Roberts, Darren; Gosselin, Sophie; Goldfarb, David S.; Kielstein, Jan T.; Mactier, Robert; Maclaren, Robert; Mowry, James B.; Bunchman, Timothy E.; Juurlink, David; Megarbane, Bruno; Anseeuw, Kurt; Winchester, James F.; Dargan, Paul I.; Liu, Kathleen D.; Hoegberg, Lotte C.; Li, Yi; Calello, Diane P.; Burdmann, Emmanuel A.; Yates, Christopher; Laliberte, Martin; Decker, Brian Scott; Mello-Da-Silva, Carlos Augusto; Lavonas, Eric; Ghannoum, Marc
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

05/11/2013

05/11/2013

2012

Resumo

Extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs), such as hemodialysis and hemoperfusion, are used in poisoning despite a lack of controlled human trials demonstrating efficacy. To provide uniform recommendations, the EXTRIP group was formed as an international collaboration among recognized experts from nephrology, clinical toxicology, critical care, or pharmacology and supported by over 30 professional societies. For every poison, the clinical benefit of ECTR is weighed against associated complications, alternative therapies, and costs. Rigorous methodology, using the AGREE instrument, was developed and ratified. Methods rely on evidence appraisal and, in the absence of robust studies, on a thorough and transparent process of consensus statements. Twenty-four poisons were chosen according to their frequency, available evidence, and relevance. A systematic literature search was performed in order to retrieve all original publications regardless of language. Data were extracted on a standardized instrument. Quality of the evidence was assessed by GRADE as: High = A, Moderate = B, Low = C, Very Low = D. For every poison, dialyzability was assessed and clinical effect of ECTR summarized. All pertinent documents were submitted to the workgroup with a list of statements for vote (general statement, indications, timing, ECTR choice). A modified Delphi method with two voting rounds was used, between which deliberation was required. Each statement was voted on a Likert scale (1-9) to establish the strength of recommendation. This approach will permit the production of the first important practice guidelines on this topic.

Fresenius Medical Care

Fresenius Medical Care

Leo Pharma

Leo Pharma

Janssen-Ortho

JanssenOrtho

Fresenius Canada

Fresenius Canada

Amgen Canada

Amgen Canada

Servier

Servier

Identificador

CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, NEW YORK, v. 50, n. 5, supl. 1, Part 3, pp. 403-413, JUN, 2012

1556-3650

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/40958

10.3109/15563650.2012.683436

http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2012.683436

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

INFORMA HEALTHCARE

NEW YORK

Relação

CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright INFORMA HEALTHCARE

Palavras-Chave #HEMODIALYSIS #HEMOPERFUSION #EXTRACORPOREAL TREATMENTS #EXTRIP #POISONING #INTOXICATION #OVERDOSE #TOXICOLOGY PRACTICE GUIDELINES #AMERICAN-ACADEMY #HEMODIALYSIS #MANAGEMENT #QUALITY #TOXICOLOGY
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion