Comparison of screening methods for conductive hearing loss identification in children: low-cost proposal


Autoria(s): Samelli, A. G.; Rabelo, C. M.; Pereira, M. B.; Portela, M. N.; Sanches, S. G. G.; Neves-Lobo, I. F.
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

01/11/2013

01/11/2013

2012

Resumo

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of two screening methods (imitanciometry screening and questionnaire) to identify children at risk for conductive hearing loss, comparing this data with complete audiologic evaluation. Methods Of 507 children aged between three and six, 111 completed all procedures. The observational methods used were: imitanciometry screening, a questionnaire to identify risk factors for hearing loss and complete audiologic evaluation. Results obtained in the first two instruments were compared with results from complete audiologic evaluation (gold standard). From these comparisons, sensitivity and specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and odds ratio were determined for the two screening methods and for the combination of both methods. Results The two methods applied in series (questionnaire and after imitanciometry screening) showed a greater odds ratio and better correlation between sensitivity and proportion of false-positives (ROC curve). Conclusion Combining the two tests in series improved screening accuracy. This combination was the best tool for identifying children at risk for conductive hearing loss.

FAPESP (The State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation)

FAPESP (The State of Sao Paulo Research Foundation) [2008/08496-7]

Identificador

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, LONDON, v. 19, n. 1, supl. 1, Part 3, pp. 1-7, MAR, 2012

0969-1413

http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/37356

10.1258/jms.2012.011051

http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jms.2012.011051

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

ROYAL SOC MEDICINE PRESS LTD

LONDON

Relação

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright ROYAL SOC MEDICINE PRESS LTD

Palavras-Chave #OTITIS-MEDIA #IMPAIRMENT #QUESTIONNAIRE #EFFUSION #PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion