Selection of Effective Stone Tools by Wild Bearded Capuchin Monkeys


Autoria(s): VISALBERGHI, Elisabetta; ADDESSI, Elsa; TRUPPA, Valentina; SPAGNOLETTI, Noemi; OTTONI, Eduardo; IZAR, Patricia; FRAGASZY, Dorothy
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

20/10/2012

20/10/2012

2009

Resumo

Appreciation of objects` affordances and planning is a hallmark of human technology. Archeological evidence suggests that Pliocene hominins selected raw material for tool making [1, 2]. Stone pounding has been considered a precursor to tool making [3, 4], and tool use by living primates provides insight into the origins of material selection by human ancestors. No study has experimentally investigated selectivity of stone tools in wild animals, although chimpanzees appear to select stones according to properties of different nut species [5, 6]. We recently discovered that wild capuchins with terrestrial habits [7] use hammers to crack open nuts on anvils [8-10]. As for chimpanzees, examination of anvil sites suggests stone selectivity [11], but indirect evidence cannot prove it. Here, we demonstrate that capuchins, which last shared a common ancestor with humans 35 million years ago, faced with stones differing in functional features (friability and weight) choose, transport, and use the effective stone to crack nuts. Moreover, when weight cannot be judged by visual attributes, capuchins act to gain information to guide their selection. Thus, planning actions and intentional selection of tools is within the ken of monkeys and similar to the tool activities of hominins and apes.

EU[029088]

EU

Identificador

CURRENT BIOLOGY, v.19, n.3, p.213-217, 2009

0960-9822

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/32117

10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.064

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.064

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

CELL PRESS

Relação

Current Biology

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright CELL PRESS

Palavras-Chave #CEBUS-APELLA #USE WEIGHT #LIBIDINOSUS #COGNITION #ANVILS #NUTS #Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion