Healing of implants installed in over- or under-prepared sites: an experimental study in dogs

ObjectiveTo study bone healing at implants installed with different insertion torques.Material and methodsIn six Labrador dogs, all mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted. After 4months of healing, flaps were elevated, and two implant sites were prepared at each side of the mandible. In the right side of the mandible, the distal sites were prepared conventionally, while the mesial sites were over-prepared by 0.2mm. As a consequence, a final insertion torque of similar to 30Ncm at the distal and a minimal insertion torque close to 0Ncm at the mesial sites were obtained. In the left sides of the mandible, however, the recipient sites were underprepared by 0.3mm resulting in an insertion torque of 70Ncm at both implants. Cover screws were applied, and flaps sutured to fully submerge the experimental sites. After 4months, the animals were sacrificed and ground sections obtained for histological evaluation.ResultsThe mineralized bone-to-implant contact was in the range of 55.2-62.1%, displaying the highest value at implants with similar to 30Ncm insertion torque and the lowest value at the implant sites with close to 0Ncm insertion torque. No statistically significant differences were revealed. Bone density was in the range of 43.4-54.9%, yielding the highest value at implants with 70Ncm insertion torque and the lowest at the implant sites with close to 0Ncm insertion torque. The difference between the sites of similar to 30Ncm and the corresponding 70Ncm insertion torque reached statistical significance.ConclusionsSimilar amounts of osseointegration were obtained irrespective of the insertion torque applied. Moreover, implants installed in sites with close to 0Ncm insertion torque may properly osseointegrate as well.