Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of 2 resorbable-blasting media implant surfaces at early implantation times


Autoria(s): Marin, Charles; Bonfante, Estevam A.; Jeong, Ryan; Granato, Rodrigo; Giro, Gabriela; Suzuki, Marcelo; Heitz, Claiton; Coelho, Paulo G.
Contribuinte(s)

Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)

Data(s)

27/05/2014

27/05/2014

01/08/2013

Resumo

This study evaluated 3 implant surfaces in a dog model: (1) resorbable-blasting media + acid-etched (RBMa), alumina-blasting + acid-etching (AB/AE), and AB/AE + RBMa (hybrid). All of the surfaces were minimally rough, and Ca and P were present for the RBMa and hybrid surfaces. Following 2 weeks in vivo, no significant differences were observed for torque, bone-to-implant contact, and bone-area fraction occupied measurements. Newly formed woven bone was observed in proximity with all surfaces.

Formato

445-453

Identificador

http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00156

Journal of Oral Implantology, v. 39, n. 4, p. 445-453, 2013.

0160-6972

1548-1336

http://hdl.handle.net/11449/76171

10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00156

WOS:000323804300006

2-s2.0-84883353478

Idioma(s)

eng

Relação

Journal of Oral Implantology

Direitos

closedAccess

Palavras-Chave #Histology #Implant surface #In vivo #Osseointegration #Resorbable-blasting media #Torque #aluminum oxide #hydroxyapatite #animal #biodegradable implant #bone regeneration #dental acid etching #dental surgery #dog #evaluation #male #methodology #surface property #tibia #tooth implant #tooth implantation #torque #Absorbable Implants #Acid Etching, Dental #Air Abrasion, Dental #Aluminum Oxide #Animals #Dental Implantation, Endosseous #Dental Implants #Dogs #Durapatite #Male #Surface Properties #Tibia
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article