Treatment of gingival recession with collagen membrane and DFDBA: A histometric study in dogs


Autoria(s): Rosetti, Elizabeth Pimentel; Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chierici; Cirelli, Joni Augusto; Zuza, Elizangela Partata; Marcantonio Júnior, Elcio
Contribuinte(s)

Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)

Data(s)

27/05/2014

27/05/2014

28/12/2009

Resumo

In a previous study, we evaluated the findings related to the use of resorbable collagen membranes in humans along with DFDBA (demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft). The aim of this subsequent study was to histometrically evaluate in dogs, the healing response of gingival recessions treated with collagen membrane + DFDBA (Guided Tissue Regeneration, GTR) compared to a coronally positioned flap (CPF). Two types of treatment were randomly carried out in a split-mouth study. Group 1 was considered as test (GTR: collagen membrane + DFDBA), whereas Group 2 stood for the control (only CPF). The dogs were given chemical bacterial plaque control with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate during a 90-day repair period. Afterwards, the animals were killed to obtain biopsies and histometric evaluation of the process of cementum and bone formation, epithelial migration and gingival level. A statistically significant difference was found between groups with a larger extension of neoformed cementum (GTR = 32.72%; CPF = 18.82%; p = 0.0004), new bone (GTR = 23.20%; CPF = 09.90%; p = 0.0401) and with a smaller area of residual gingival recession in the test group (GTR = 50.69%; CPF = 59.73%; p = 0.0055) compared to the control group. The only item assessed that showed no statistical difference was epithelial proliferation on the root surface, with means of 15.14% for the GTR group and 20.34% for the CPF group (p = 0.0890). Within the limits of this study we concluded that the treatment of gingival recession defects with GTR, associating collagen membrane with DFDBA, showed better outcomes in terms of a larger extension of neoformed cementum and bone, as well as in terms of a smaller proportion of residual recessions.

Formato

307-312

Identificador

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000300014

Brazilian Oral Research, v. 23, n. 3, p. 307-312, 2009.

1806-8324

1807-3107

http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71495

10.1590/S1806-83242009000300014

S1806-83242009000300014

2-s2.0-72449196993

2-s2.0-72449196993.pdf

Idioma(s)

eng

Relação

Brazilian Oral Research

Direitos

openAccess

Palavras-Chave #Comparative #Gingival recession #Guided tissue regeneration #Histology #Reconstructive surgical procedures #collagen #animal #artificial membrane #bone transplantation #comparative study #dog #freeze drying #gingiva disease #histology #methodology #pathology #periodontics #wound healing #Animals #Bone Demineralization Technique #Bone Transplantation #Collagen #Dogs #Freeze Drying #Gingival Recession #Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal #Membranes, Artificial #Wound Healing
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article