Bond strength durability of direct and indirect composite systems following surface conditioning for repair


Autoria(s): Passos, Sheila Pestana; Özcan, Mutlu; Vanderlei, Aleska Dias; Leite, Fabiola Pessoa Pereira; Kimpara, Estevão Tomomitsu; Bottino, Marco Antonio
Contribuinte(s)

Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)

Data(s)

27/05/2014

27/05/2014

16/11/2007

Resumo

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of surface conditioning methods and thermocycling on the bond strength between a resin composite and an indirect composite system in order to test the repair bond strength. Materials and Methods: Eighteen blocks (5 x 5 x 4 mm) of indirect resin composite (Sinfony) were fabricated according to the manufacturer's instructions. The specimens were randomly assigned to one of the following two treatment conditions (9 blocks per treatment): (1) 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 90 s (Dentsply) + silanization, (2) silica coating with 30-Ìm SiOx particles (CoJet) + silanization. After surface conditioning, the bonding agent was applied (Adper Single Bond) and light polymerized. The composite resin (W3D Master) was condensed and polymerized incrementally to form a block. Following storage in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h, the indirect composite/resin blocks were sectioned in two axes (x and y) with a diamond disk under coolant irrigation to obtain nontrimmed specimens (sticks) with approximately 0.6 mm2 of bonding area. Twelve specimens were obtained per block (N = 216, n = 108 sticks). The specimens from each repaired block were again randomly divided into 2 groups and tested either after storage in water for 24 h or thermocycling (6000 cycles, 5°C to 55°C). The microtensile bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed: 1 mm/min). The mean bond strengths of the specimens of each block were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results: Both surface conditioning (p = 0.0001) and storage conditions (p = 0.0001) had a significant effect on the results. After 24 h water storage, silica coating and silanization (method 2) showed significantly higher bond strength results (46.4 ± 13.8 MPa) than that of hydrofluoric acid etching and silanization (method 1) (35.8 ± 9.7 MPa) (p < 0.001). After thermocycling, no significant difference was found between the mean bond strengths obtained with method 1 (34.1 ± 8.9 MPa) and method 2 (31.9 ± 7.9 MPa) (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Although after 24 h of testing, silica coating and silanization performed significantly better in resin-resin repair bond strength, both HF acid gel and silica coating followed by silanization revealed comparable bond strength results after thermocycling for 6000 times.

Formato

443-447

Identificador

http://www.quintpub.com/journals/jad/abstract.php?article_id=8955#.U0QIX_ldV1Y

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 9, n. 5, p. 443-447, 2007.

1461-5185

http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69986

WOS:000250298900006

2-s2.0-36049023447

Idioma(s)

eng

Relação

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Direitos

closedAccess

Palavras-Chave #Hydrofluoric acid #Indirect composite #Microtensile test #Repair #Silica coating #hydrofluoric acid #resin #silane derivative #silicon dioxide #analysis of variance #dental bonding #dental care #dental etching #drug storage #methodology #randomization #surface property #tensile strength #tooth prosthesis #Analysis of Variance #Composite Resins #Dental Bonding #Dental Etching #Dental Prosthesis Repair #Dental Stress Analysis #Drug Storage #Hydrofluoric Acid #Random Allocation #Silanes #Silicon Dioxide #Surface Properties #Tensile Strength
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article