Bone healing in surgically created defects treated with either bioactive glass particles, a calcium sulfate barrier, or a combination of both materials: A histological and histometric study in rat tibias


Autoria(s): Melo, Luiz G. N.; Nagata, Maria José Hitomi; Bosco, Álvaro Francisco; Ribeiro, Luciana L. G.; Leite, Cristiane M.
Contribuinte(s)

Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)

Data(s)

27/05/2014

27/05/2014

01/12/2005

Resumo

Objective: The purpose of this study was to histologically analyze the influence of bioactive glass and/or a calcium sulfate barrier on bone healing in surgically created defects in rat tibias. Material and methods: Sixty-four rats were divided into 4 groups: C (control), CS (calcium sulfate), BG (bioactive glass), and BG/CS (bioactive glass/calcium sulfate). A surgical defect was created in the tibia of each animal. In Group CS, a calcium sulfate barrier was placed to cover the defect. In Group BG the defect was filled with bioactive glass. In Group BG/CS, it was filled with bioactive glass and protected by a barrier of calcium sulfate. Animals were sacrificed at 10 or 30 days post-operative. The formation of new bone in the cortical area of the defect was evaluated histomorphometrically. Results: At 10 days post-operative, Group C presented significantly more bone formation than Groups CS, BG, or BG/CS. No statistically significant differences were found between the experimental groups. At 30 days post-operative, Group C demonstrated significantly more bone formation than the experimental groups. Groups CS and BG/CS showed significantly more bone formation than Group BG. No statistically significant differences were found between Group CS and BG/CS. Conclusions: (a) the control groups had significantly more bone formation than the experimental groups; (b) at 10 days post-operative, no significant differences were found between any of the experimental groups; and (c) at 30 days post-operative, the groups with a calcium sulfate barrier had significantly more bone formation than the group that used bioactive glass only. Copyright © Blackwell Munksgaard 2005.

Formato

683-691

Identificador

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01090.x

Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 16, n. 6, p. 683-691, 2005.

0905-7161

1600-0501

http://hdl.handle.net/11449/68548

10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01090.x

WOS:000233290200008

2-s2.0-33644697375

Idioma(s)

eng

Relação

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Direitos

closedAccess

Palavras-Chave #Bioactive #Bone regeneration #Bone substitutes #Calcium sulfate #Glass #bioglass #calcium sulfate #animal #artificial membrane #bone prosthesis #bone regeneration #ceramics #comparative study #drug effect #image processing #male #methodology #periodontics #physiology #rat #tibia #Animals #Bone Regeneration #Bone Substitutes #Calcium Sulfate #Ceramics #Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal #Image Processing, Computer-Assisted #Male #Membranes, Artificial #Rats #Tibia
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article