Cross-cultural adaptation of the Portuguese version of the patient-generated subjective global assessment


Autoria(s): Duarte Bonini Campos, J. A.; Dias do Prado, C.
Contribuinte(s)

Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)

Data(s)

20/05/2014

20/05/2014

01/03/2012

Resumo

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Processo FAPESP: 08/00377-9

Introduction: The cross-cultural adaptation of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment is important so it can be used with confidence in Portuguese language.Objective: To perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Portuguese version of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment and to estimate its intrarater reliability.Material and methods: This is a validation study. Face Validity was classified by 17 health professionals and 10 Portuguese language specialists. Idiomatic, semantic, cultural and conceptual equivalences were analyzed. The questionnaire was completed by 20 patients of the Amaral Carvalho Hospital (Jau, São Paulo, Brazil) in order to verify the Comprehension Index of each item. Therefore, 27 committee members classified each item into "essential", "useful, but not essential" and "not necessary", in order to calculate the Content Validity Ratio. After, this version of the questionnaire was applied twice to 62 patients of the hospital cited above. The intrarater reliability of the nutritional status analyzed by Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment was estimated by Kappa statistics.Results: The Portuguese version of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment presented 10 incomprehensible expressions. The items "a year ago weight" and "dry mouth symptom" presented the lowest Content Validity Ratio. Substantial intrarater reliability (k = 0.78, p = 0.001) was observed.Conclusion: The cross-cultural adaptation of the Portuguese version of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment became simple and understandable for Brazilian patients. Thus, this version of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment was considered a valid and a reliable method. (Nutr Hosp. 2012;27:583-589) DOI:10.3305/nh.2012.27.2.5634

Formato

583-589

Identificador

http://dx.doi.org/10.3305/nh.2012.27.2.5634

Nutricion Hospitalaria. Madrid: Aula Médica Ediciones, v. 27, n. 2, p. 583-589, 2012.

0212-1611

http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16814

10.3305/nh.2012.27.2.5634

WOS:000301822300035

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Aula Médica Ediciones

Relação

Nutricion Hospitalaria

Direitos

openAccess

Palavras-Chave #Neoplasms #Nutritional status #Cachexia Validation studies #Psychometrics
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article