Effect of monomer treatment and polymerisation methods on the bond strength of resin teeth to denture base material


Autoria(s): Barbosa, Débora de Barros; Monteiro, Douglas Roberto; Ricardo Barao, Valentim Adelino; Pero, Ana Carolina; Compagnoni, Marco Antonio
Contribuinte(s)

Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)

Data(s)

30/09/2013

20/05/2014

30/09/2013

20/05/2014

01/09/2009

Resumo

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Processo FAPESP: 04/11250-9

Processo FAPESP: 04/10600-6

Background:The fracture between acrylic denture base material and artificial teeth is a common clinical occurrence in dental prosthodontic practice.Objective:To evaluate the bond strength between acrylic resins and resin denture teeth when submitted by two protocols of monomer liquid application on the tooth surface and using different polymerisation methods.Material and methods:Microwave-polymerised (Onda-Cryl), heat-polymerised (Classico) and autopolymerising (Jet) acrylic resins and a brand of resin denture teeth (Biotone) were used. The acrylic resins were polymerised according to the cycles: (A) microwave - fast cycle, Onda-Cryl; (B) microwave - long cycle, Onda-Cryl; (C) microwave - manufacturer's cycle, Onda-Cryl; (T) water bath - long cycle, Classico and (Q) bench polymerisation cycle, Jet. Thirty specimens were prepared for each polymerisation method; 10 were packed with acrylic resin after 60 s of monomer liquid application on the tooth surface, 10 after 180 s and 10 without any monomer liquid application. For the purpose of the study, a shear test was used. anova and Tukey tests were performed to identify significant differences (alpha = 0.05).Results:The highest bond strength values were found for monomer surface treatments, regardless of the polymerisation cycles. The highest significant values were found for cycles B (15.4 +/- 1.8 MPa), C (11.9 +/- 4.9 MPa) and T (15.4 +/- 2.6 MPa) for non-treated and 60 s methylmethacrylate treated groups. Comparing the monomer liquid treatment, they did not differ significantly (p > 0.05), except for cycle A (p < 0.05).Conclusion:Chemical treatment using monomer on the tooth surface prior to the acrylic resin packing improved the bond strength between resin denture tooth and acrylic resin, regardless of monomer liquid treatment protocols. The microwavable resin, polymerised by fast cycle and autopolymerising resin should be avoided for processing denture and denture repairs, respectively.

Formato

225-231

Identificador

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2008.00262.x

Gerodontology. Malden: Wiley-blackwell Publishing, Inc, v. 26, n. 3, p. 225-231, 2009.

0734-0664

http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15202

10.1111/j.1741-2358.2008.00262.x

WOS:000268926600011

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc

Relação

Gerodontology

Direitos

closedAccess

Palavras-Chave #acrylic resins #bonding #shear strength #denture bases #tooth #artificial #chemical treatment
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article