Challenges of diabetes prevention in the real world : results and lessons from the Melbourne diabetes prevention study


Autoria(s): Dunbar, James A.; Hernan, Andrea L.; Janus, Edward D.; Vartiainen, Erkki; Laatikainen, Tiina; Versace, Vincent L.; Reynolds, John; Best, James D.; Skinner, Timothy C.; O'Reilly, Sharleen L.; Mc Namara, Kevin P.; Stewart, Elizabeth; Coates, Michael; Bennett, Catherine M.; Carter, Rob
Data(s)

01/01/2015

Resumo

OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and implementability of the public health programme Life! Taking action on diabetes in Australian people at risk of developing type 2 diabetes. <br /><br />RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Melbourne Diabetes Prevention Study (MDPS) was a unique study assessing effectiveness of Life! that used a randomized controlled trial design. Intervention participants with AUSDRISK score ≥15 received 1 individual and 5 structured 90 min group sessions. Controls received usual care. Outcome measures were obtained for all participants at baseline and 12 months and, additionally, for intervention participants at 3 months. Per protocol set (PPS) and intention to treat (ITT) analyses were performed. <br /><br />RESULTS: PPS analyses were considered more informative from our study. In PPS analyses, intervention participants significantly improved in weight (-1.13 kg, p=0.016), waist circumference (-1.35 cm, p=0.044), systolic (-5.2 mm Hg, p=0.028) and diastolic blood pressure (-3.2 mm Hg, p=0.030) compared with controls. Based on observed weight change, estimated risk of developing diabetes reduced by 9.6% in the intervention and increased by 3.3% in control participants. Absolute 5-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduced significantly for intervention participants by 0.97 percentage points from 9.35% (10.4% relative risk reduction). In control participants, the risk increased by 0.11 percentage points (1.3% relative risk increase). The net effect for the change in CVD risk was -1.08 percentage points of absolute risk (p=0.013). <br /><br />CONCLUSIONS: MDPS effectively reduced the risk of diabetes and CVD, but the intervention effect on weight and waist reduction was modest due to the challenges in recruiting high-risk individuals and the abbreviated intervention.

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30079360

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

BMJ Publishing Group

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30079360/dunbar-challengesofdiabetes-2015.pdf

http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000131

Direitos

2015, The Authors

Palavras-Chave #Cardiovascular Prevention #Intervention #Public Health #Type 2 Diabetes
Tipo

Journal Article