Student knowledge: curriculum, assessment and reporting
Data(s) |
01/11/2015
|
---|---|
Resumo |
At a time when national and international high-stakes testing has assumed such prominence, one might begin to wonder about the status of teacher judgement when assessing and reporting on children’s knowledge and skills against the descriptors specified in curriculum standards. Were standardised test results congruent with the judgements that teachers make when reporting on students’ achievement, concern about how one type of judgement might compare with another would perhaps be unwarranted. This article draws on research that has investigated whether standardised assessments in the state of Victoria, Australia are actually comparable with teacher’s judgements about their students’ work to illustrate that discrepancies do exist. These results have been interpreted within an analytical framework that derives from Aristotle’s (350BC/2000) distinction between three types of knowledge, namely epistemic, technical and phronetic knowledge. |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
University of South Australia |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30079707/nicholas-studentknowledge-2015.pdf http://www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/EDEQ/article/view/954/795 |
Direitos |
2015, University of South Australia |
Palavras-Chave | #Teacher judgement #Curriculum #Assessment #Reporting |
Tipo |
Journal Article |