Merleau-Ponty and Embodied Cognitive Science


Autoria(s): Pollard,CJ
Data(s)

01/01/2014

Resumo

What would the Merleau-Ponty of Phenomenology of Perception have thought of the use of his phenomenology in the cognitive sciences? This question raises the issue of Merleau-Ponty’s conception of the relationship between the sciences and philosophy, and of what he took the philosophical significance of his phenomenology to be. In this article I suggest an answer to this question through a discussion of certain claims made in connection to the “post-cognitivist” approach to cognitive science by Hubert Dreyfus, Shaun Gallagher and Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson and Eleanor Rosch. I suggest that these claims are indicative of an appropriation of Merleau-Ponty’s thought that he would have welcomed as innovative science. Despite this, I argue that he would have viewed this use of his work as potentially occluding the full philosophical significance that he believed his phenomenological investigations to contain.

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30073834

Publicador

Quodlibet

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30073834/t035941-Pollard-MerleauPonty-2014.pdf

Direitos

2014, Quodlibet

Palavras-Chave #Phenomenology #Naturalization of Phenomenology #Lived Body #Motor-intentionality #Body Schema
Tipo

Journal Article