After Romanticism, psychoanalysis and postmodernism: new paradigms for theorising creativity
Data(s) |
01/10/2014
|
---|---|
Resumo |
While Romanticism, psychoanalysis and postmodern theory have provided the dominant paradigms for understanding creativity in the humanities in the past century, this paper argues that interdisciplinary engagement with sociobiology and the cognitive sciences might provide ground-breaking perspectives. Against the ‘supra-rational’, masculinist and solipsistic visions of creativity that have prevailed, the work of the sociobiologist Ellen Dissanayake and of the neuroscientist Antonio Damasio invite new ways of thinking about the role of the feeling body, femininity and mutuality in creative practice. This paper will survey Dissanayake’s and Damasio’s research to explore the possibility and desirability of a paradigm shift when it comes to understanding creativity, with poetry as a strategic focus for its argument. This paper is not interested in putting forward a new methodology for writing poetry but in recognising the embodied condition from which all poetry fundamentally arises. |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Australian Association of Writing Programs |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30072447/takolander-afterromanticism-2014.pdf http://www.textjournal.com.au/oct14/takolander.htm |
Direitos |
2014, AAWP |
Tipo |
Journal Article |