Why has the safety and quality movement been slow to improve care?


Autoria(s): Phelps,Grant; Barach,Paul
Data(s)

01/08/2014

Resumo

Buist and Middleton lament that the safety and quality 'agenda' has failed to fundamentally alter the safety of healthcare systems, in part because of the disengagement of doctors from their responsibilities for patient safety . While there have been discernable improvements in the efficiency and effectiveness of care in some settings, patients still experience unacceptable harm and often struggle to have their voices heard; processes are not as efficient as they could be; and costs continue to rise at alarming rates while quality issues remain . Perhaps of most concern, recent public reports into health system failures continue to document a widespread lack of attentiveness to patient concerns, a culture of denial and widespread lack of professionalism . Alarmingly, clinician discontentment, cynicism and burn-out are reflected in antagonistic language by clinicians about the healthcare system and their patients. Taken together with the many dissatisfied and now more vocal patient groups, all point to an unprecedented crisis of faith in our healthcare systems which has been getting worse over past decade . This personal perspective aims to address the fundamental tensions that are keeping much of healthcare reform efforts from successfully transforming the culture and outcomes except at the margins.

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30070075

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Wiley

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30070075/phelps-whyhas-2014.pdf

http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12413

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25074334

Direitos

2014, Wiley-Blackwell

Palavras-Chave #Science & Technology #Life Sciences & Biomedicine #Medicine, General & Internal #Pharmacology & Pharmacy #General & Internal Medicine #PATIENT SAFETY #HEALTH-CARE
Tipo

Journal Article