Transcendental Priority and Deleuzian Normativity. A reply to James Williams
Data(s) |
01/01/2008
|
---|---|
Resumo |
I am grateful that someone whose work I greatly admire could be the philosopher to so eloquently and succinctly cut to the heart of the problem that I posed in the previous issue of Deleuze Studies. James Williams' critical reply leaves me, prima facie, confronted by a stark alternative: either I have misunderstood Deleuze, or I have illustrated problems and lacunae in Deleuze. I will suggest, however, that this is a false alternative, and that Williams' and my divergent accounts of The Logic of Sense – and even Deleuze's oeuvre as a whole – is better understood as a situation of ‘both/and’ rather than ‘either/or’, and hence that my interpretation of Deleuze isn't wrong, but necessarily iconoclastic. |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Edinburgh University Press |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30061151/reynolds-transcendentalpriority-2008.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/E1750224108000184 |
Direitos |
2008, Edinburgh University Press |
Tipo |
Journal Article |