Commentary: Ending the ban on recreational substance use in sport: and then what?


Autoria(s): Dunn, Matthew
Data(s)

01/06/2013

Resumo

 As London 2012 starts to become a distant memory, and Sochi 2014 becomes a near reality, it is timely that Waddington, Christiansen, Gleaves, Hoberman, and Moller (2013) and Henne, Koh, and McDermott (2013) have brought to the fore the inconsistencies within the World Anti-Doping Agency's (WADA's) policies regarding drug use in sport. These inconsistencies are not new; Smith and Stewart (2008) highlighted the inconsistencies and ambiguities of WADA policy, but nothing has changed in this time. Why a substance is placed on the banned list is an important discussion that should be occurring; however, this discussion should not be occurring in the isolation of the sporting world.

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30057488

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Elsevier BV

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30057488/dunn-commentaryending-2013.pdf

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2013.08.006

Direitos

2013, Elsevier

Palavras-Chave #recreational substance use #sport #WADA #WADA prohibited list
Tipo

Journal Article