Commentary: Ending the ban on recreational substance use in sport: and then what?
Data(s) |
01/06/2013
|
---|---|
Resumo |
As London 2012 starts to become a distant memory, and Sochi 2014 becomes a near reality, it is timely that Waddington, Christiansen, Gleaves, Hoberman, and Moller (2013) and Henne, Koh, and McDermott (2013) have brought to the fore the inconsistencies within the World Anti-Doping Agency's (WADA's) policies regarding drug use in sport. These inconsistencies are not new; Smith and Stewart (2008) highlighted the inconsistencies and ambiguities of WADA policy, but nothing has changed in this time. Why a substance is placed on the banned list is an important discussion that should be occurring; however, this discussion should not be occurring in the isolation of the sporting world. |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Elsevier BV |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30057488/dunn-commentaryending-2013.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2013.08.006 |
Direitos |
2013, Elsevier |
Palavras-Chave | #recreational substance use #sport #WADA #WADA prohibited list |
Tipo |
Journal Article |