Ethical discriminations? Representing the reprehensible
Data(s) |
01/01/2003
|
---|---|
Resumo |
This paper reflects upon the ‘goodness’ or ‘ethics’ of Critical Management/ Critical Organisation Studies (COS) research practices. I argue that academic representations of others entail an ethical responsibility to the researched, a responsibility that COS is, as yet, insufficiently exploring. Reflecting upon my own research with those who have colluded in discrimination and Stanley and Wise’s (1979) research on obscene telephone callers, I explore the nature and limits of responsibility when researching those who have acted reprehensibly. I end by arguing that COS “owe(s) some responsibility to ‘the researched’ of all kinds, whether we morally approve of them or not” (Stanley and Wise 1993:177). |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Tamara |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30041668/wraybliss-ethicaldiscriminations-2003.pdf http://www.peaceaware.com/tamara/issues/volume_2/issue_2_3/Ethical Discrim_WrayBliss.pdf |
Direitos |
2003, TamaraLand Publishers |
Palavras-Chave | #goodness #ethics #critical organisation studies (COS) #discrimination |
Tipo |
Journal Article |