Framing our understanding of learning spaces redesign
Contribuinte(s) |
[unknown] |
---|---|
Data(s) |
01/01/2011
|
Resumo |
Based on the assumption that space is not neutral (Gulson and Symes 2010, Soja 1989, Massey 1994) this paper presents the framework and findings of a literature review into the connections between learning spaces, school organisations, teaching and learning. The literature review identified that there are four temporal dimensions to redesigning built learning spaces: design, transition, consolidation, sustainability/evaluation. But the focus of research and policy has been on the design phase (Tanner 2009). The paper argues the research literature is more aspirational about what redesign of space around flexibility and connectivity but there is as yet lack of coherent evidence on the use of these spaces (Higgins et al 2005). Furthermore, it suggest the need to consider the various actors- the practitioners, learners and spaces- as participative redesign (Fisher 2010, Holloway and Valentine 2000) is ongoing and necessary as schools and teacher become involved over time in serial redesign. This framework guides the analysis of current and future research into learning spaces in Victoria. |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Australian Association for Research in Education |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30041191/bateman-framingour-2011.pdf http://www.aare.edu.au/live/index.php?option=com_content |
Direitos |
2011, AARE |
Palavras-Chave | #design #learning space #built environment |
Tipo |
Conference Paper |