Beyond Simon’s means-ends analysis : natural creativity and the unanswered ‘why’ in the design of intelligent systems for problem-solving
Data(s) |
01/01/2010
|
---|---|
Resumo |
Goal-directed problem solving as originally advocated by Herbert Simon’s means-ends analysis model has primarily shaped the course of design research on artificially intelligent systems for problem-solving. We contend that there is a definite disregard of a key phase within the overall design process that in fact logically precedes the actual problem solving phase. While systems designers have traditionally been obsessed with goal-directed problem solving, the basic determinants of the ultimate desired goal state still remain to be fully understood or categorically defined. We propose a rational framework built on a set of logically interconnected conjectures to specifically recognize this neglected phase in the overall design process of intelligent systems for practical problem-solving applications.<br /> |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Springer Science+Business Media B.V. |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30032233/bhattacharya-beyondsimons-evidence-2010.pdf http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30032233/bhattacharya-beyondsimonsmeans-2010.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9198-7 |
Direitos |
2010, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. |
Palavras-Chave | #design #problem solving #creativity #artificially intelligent systems |
Tipo |
Journal Article |