Child protection practitioners and decision-making tools : observations and reflections from the front line


Autoria(s): Gillingham, Philip; Humphreys, Catherine
Data(s)

01/12/2010

Resumo

Decision-making tools, particularly risk-assessment tools, have been implemented by governments around the world, perhaps most notably in the field of child protection, though little attention has been paid to how practitioners use them. This article presents the findings from ethnographic research that explored how child protection practitioners in the Department of Child Safety, Queensland, Australia, used four Structured Decision Making tools developed by the Children's Research Centre in Wisconsin in their daily practice in the intake and investigation stages of a case. The findings that the tools were not being used as intended by their designers and, in fact, tended to undermine the development of expertise by child protection workers has profound implications for the future development of technological approaches to child protection and, more broadly, human services practice. <br />

Identificador

http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30031573

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Oxford University Press

Relação

http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30031573/gillingham-childprotectionpractitioners-2010.pdf

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp155

Direitos

2009, The Authors

Palavras-Chave #risk assessment #structured decision making #child protection #ICT
Tipo

Journal Article