Australia's strengths and weaknesses in technology transfer and R&D exploitation : GEM survey "experts" views compared with public policy and other published data
Contribuinte(s) |
Murray, Gillin L. Butler, John Douglas, Evan Hindle, Kevin La Pira, Frank Lindsay, Noel Shepherd, Dean Yencken, John Shaker, Zara |
---|---|
Data(s) |
01/01/2004
|
Resumo |
There has been increasing public debate in Australia in recent years about research culture in universities and other publicly funded research agencies such as CSIRO and its impact on Australia's performance in generating economic, social and environmental benefits to the Australian community from the large amount of public funding for R&D. This is the supply side issue. On the demand side there is equally concern about the technology absorptive capacity of Australian. business as illustrated by the low proportion of gross business research expenditure (GERD) spent by business (BERD). Against this background, this paper has explored the views of abut 100 "experts" interviewed in the Australian Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) studies in the years 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 on the issues, strengths and weaknesses of Australia's technology transfer performance as it applies to new technology small firms. The paper has also explored evidence for any longitudinal change over this period.<br /> |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Swinburne University of Technology, The Australian Graduate School of Entrepreneurship |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30022441/hindle-australiasstrengthsand-2004.pdf http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30022441/hindle-australiasstrengthsand-post-2004.pdf |
Direitos |
2004, Swinburne University of Technology, AGSE |
Tipo |
Conference Paper |