Are youth mentoring programs good value-for-money? An evaluation of the Big Brothers Big Sisters Melbourne program

<b>Background : </b>The Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) program matches vulnerable young people with a trained, supervised adult volunteer as mentor. The young people are typically seriously disadvantaged, with multiple psychosocial problems.<br /><br /><b>Methods : </b>Threshold analysis was undertaken to determine whether investment in the program was a worthwhile use of limited public funds. The potential cost savings were based on US estimates of life-time costs associated with high-risk youth who drop out-of-school and become adult criminals. The intervention was modelled for children aged 10–14 years residing in Melbourne in 2004.<br /><br /><b>Results :</b> If the program serviced 2,208 of the most vulnerable young people, it would cost AUD 39.5 M. Assuming 50% were high-risk, the associated costs of their adult criminality would be AUD 3.3 billion. To break even, the program would need to avert high-risk behaviours in only 1.3% (14/1,104) of participants.<br /><br /><b>Conclusion :</b> This indicative evaluation suggests that the BBBS program represents excellent 'value for money'.<br />