Alarmed, but not alert in the "war on terror"? The High Court, Thomas V Mowbray and the Defence Power
Data(s) |
01/01/2008
|
---|---|
Resumo |
The article examines the judgment in Thomas v. Mowbray by the High Court in Australia handed down during the so called 'War on Terror'. According to the author, (i) the High Court de-emphasized the importance of the difference between war and peace in fixing the scope of the defence power in the Australian Constitution in a manner which was inconsistent with its earlier celebrated decision in the Communist Party Case in 1950 during the Cold War; and (ii) failed to apply a sufficiently rigorous test of proportionality in characterising the impugned Commonwealth laws. The article discuss the legal background and social implications of the High Court's decision, using the Communist Party Case in 1950 as a point of comparison.<br /> |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
James Cook University |
Relação |
http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30018019/roos-alarmedbutnot-2008.pdf http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true |
Direitos |
2008, James Cook University Law Review |
Palavras-Chave | #judgements #actions and defences #terrorism #war and society #social aspects #Australia high court |
Tipo |
Journal Article |