When being a boy is everything: understanding Re Alex

The decision of the Family Court of Australia in the matter of Re Alex¹demonstrated yet again that there's nothing .like a bit of under-age sex to raise the armchair experts from their usual near-supine positions. The  opinions of commentators like Bill Muehlenberg,² John Flemming³ and Babette Francis⁴ and even, unfortunately, the July 2004 "According to Merit" article⁵ have been unlikely to advance the profession's understanding of the complex issues faced by people experiencing transsexualism. The factors that should be considered in determining a person's sex for the purpose of the law in Australia are now well-settled, yet controversies over diagnoses, access to treatment and consequent legal status continue almost unabated as Alex's case has so aptly demonstrated.<br />