How single is ‘single’ : some pragmatic reflections on single versus multifaceted interventions to facilitate implementation


Autoria(s): Eldh, Ann Catrine; Wallin, Lars
Data(s)

2015

Resumo

An earlier overview of systematic reviews and a subsequent editorial on single-component versus multifaceted interventions to promote knowledge translation (KT) highlight complex issues in implementation science. In this supplemented commentary, further aspects are in focus; we propose examples from (KT) studies probing the issue of single interventions. A main point is that defining what is a single and what is a multifaceted intervention can be ambiguous, depending on how the intervention is conceived. Further, we suggest additional perspectives in terms of strategies to facilitate implementation. More specifically, we argue for a need to depict not only what activities are done in implementation interventions, but to unpack functions in particular contexts, in order to support the progress of implementation science.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-19073

doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.133

PMID 26673184

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

Högskolan Dalarna, Omvårdnad

Högskolan Dalarna, Omvårdnad

Karolinska institutet

Karolinska institutet

Relação

International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2322-5939, 2015, 4:10, s. 699-701

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Palavras-Chave #Facilitation #Implementation #Knowledge Translation (KT) #Multifaceted Interventions #Single Interventions #Nursing #Omvårdnad
Tipo

Article in journal

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

text