How single is ‘single’ : some pragmatic reflections on single versus multifaceted interventions to facilitate implementation
Data(s) |
2015
|
---|---|
Resumo |
An earlier overview of systematic reviews and a subsequent editorial on single-component versus multifaceted interventions to promote knowledge translation (KT) highlight complex issues in implementation science. In this supplemented commentary, further aspects are in focus; we propose examples from (KT) studies probing the issue of single interventions. A main point is that defining what is a single and what is a multifaceted intervention can be ambiguous, depending on how the intervention is conceived. Further, we suggest additional perspectives in terms of strategies to facilitate implementation. More specifically, we argue for a need to depict not only what activities are done in implementation interventions, but to unpack functions in particular contexts, in order to support the progress of implementation science. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-19073 doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.133 PMID 26673184 |
Idioma(s) |
eng |
Publicador |
Högskolan Dalarna, Omvårdnad Högskolan Dalarna, Omvårdnad Karolinska institutet Karolinska institutet |
Relação |
International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2322-5939, 2015, 4:10, s. 699-701 |
Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Palavras-Chave | #Facilitation #Implementation #Knowledge Translation (KT) #Multifaceted Interventions #Single Interventions #Nursing #Omvårdnad |
Tipo |
Article in journal info:eu-repo/semantics/article text |