Ridge Preservation With Acellular Dermal Matrix and Anorganic Bone Matrix Cell-Binding Peptide P-15 After Tooth Extraction in Humans


Autoria(s): FERNANDES, Patricia Garani; NOVAES JR., Arthur B.; QUEIROZ, Adriana Correa de; SOUZA, Sergio Luis Scombatti de; TABA JR., Mario; PALIOTO, Daniela Bazan; GRISI, Marcio Fernando de Moraes
Contribuinte(s)

UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO

Data(s)

19/10/2012

19/10/2012

2011

Resumo

Background: Preventing ridge collapse with the extraction of maxillary anterior teeth is vital to an esthetic restorative result. Several regenerative techniques are available and are used for socket preservation. The aim of this study is to analyze by clinical parameters the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (ABM) with synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 to preserve alveolar bone after tooth extraction. Methods: Eighteen patients in need of extraction of maxillary anterior teeth were selected and randomly assigned to the test group (ADM plus ABM/P-15) or the control group (ADM only). Clinical measurements were recorded initially and at 6 months after ridge-preservation procedures. Results: In the clinical measurements (external vertical palatal measurement [EVPM], external vertical buccal measurement [EVBM], and alveolar horizontal measurement [AHM]) the statistical analysis showed no difference between test and control groups initially and at 6 months. The intragroup analysis, after 6 months, showed a statistically significant reduction in the measurements for both groups. In the comparison between the two groups, the differences in the test group were as follows: EVPM = 0.83 +/- 1.53 mm; EVBM = 1.20 +/- 2.02 mm; and AHM = 2.53 +/- 1.81 mm. The differences in the control group were as follows: EVPM = 0.87 +/- 1.13 mm; EVBM = 1.50 +/- 1.15 mm; and AHM = 3.40 +/- 1.39 mm. The differences in EVPM and EVBM were not statistically significant; however, in horizontal measurement (AHM), there was a statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study show that ADM used as membrane associated with ABM/P-15 can be used to reduce buccal-palatal dimensions compared to ADM alone for preservation of the alveolar ridge after extraction of anterior maxillary teeth. J Periodontol 2011;82:72-79.

Identificador

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, v.82, n.1, p.72-79, 2011

0022-3492

http://producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/26417

10.1902/jop.2010.100241

http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100241

Idioma(s)

eng

Publicador

AMER ACAD PERIODONTOLOGY

Relação

Journal of Periodontology

Direitos

restrictedAccess

Copyright AMER ACAD PERIODONTOLOGY

Palavras-Chave #Biocompatible materials #bone regeneration #grafting, bone #socket graft #tooth extraction #GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION #ALVEOLAR BONE #POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE MEMBRANE #IMPLANT PLACEMENT #DEFECTS #AUGMENTATION #DOGS #ALLOGRAFT #SOCKETS #GRAFT #Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Tipo

article

original article

publishedVersion