Nonhuman empires
Data(s) |
15/05/2015
|
---|---|
Resumo |
The themed section “Nonhuman Empires” contributes to a critique of anthropocentrism in the field of imperial history. It reveals the variety of ways in which the historical trajectories of nonhuman animals and empires both intersected and informed one another. Beyond merely rehabilitating nonhuman themes in conversations about imperial history, it provides a platform for rethinking both nonhumans and empires as they are envisioned conventionally in the historiography. This introductory article begins by situating this special section as a conversation between science studies and animal studies, on the one hand, and the historiography of empires, on the other. It then suggests ways to reconceptualize agency, subjects, nonhumans, and empire by combining certain shared concerns of subaltern studies and actor-network theory. Finally, it emphasizes the need to integrate postcolonial critiques with emerging scholarship about the posthuman. |
Formato |
text |
Identificador |
http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/48953/1/Nonhuman%20Empires.pdf Deb Roy, R. <http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/view/creators/90006986.html> (2015) Nonhuman empires. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 35 (1). pp. 66-75. ISSN 1548-226X doi: 10.1215/1089201X-2876104 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/1089201X-2876104 > |
Idioma(s) |
en |
Publicador |
Duke University Press |
Relação |
http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/48953/ creatorInternal Deb Roy, Rohan 10.1215/1089201X-2876104 |
Tipo |
Article PeerReviewed |