Distraction control processes in free recall: benefits and costs to performance


Autoria(s): Marsh, John E.; Sörqvist, Patrik; Hodgetts, Helen M.; Beaman, C. Philip; Jones, Dylan M.
Data(s)

05/06/2014

Resumo

How is semantic memory influenced by individual differences under conditions of distraction? This question was addressed by observing how visual target words—drawn from a single category—were recalled whilst ignoring spoken distracter words that were either members of the same, or members of a different (single) category. Working memory capacity (WMC) was related to disruption only with synchronous, not asynchronous, presentation and distraction was greater when the words were presented synchronously. Subsequent experiments found greater negative priming of distracters amongst individuals with higher WMC but this may be dependent on targets and distracters being comparable category exemplars. With less dominant category members as distracters, target recall was impaired – relative to control – only amongst individuals with low WMC. The results highlight the role of cognitive control resources in target-distracter selection and the individual-specific cost implications of such cognitive control.

Formato

text

Identificador

http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/36903/1/JEP_WMC_paper_2014.pdf

Marsh, J. E., Sörqvist, P., Hodgetts, H. M., Beaman, C. P. <http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/view/creators/90000286.html> and Jones, D. M. (2014) Distraction control processes in free recall: benefits and costs to performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 41 (1). pp. 118-133. ISSN 0278-7393 doi: 10.1037/a0037779 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037779>

Idioma(s)

en

Publicador

American Psychological Association.

Relação

http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/36903/

creatorInternal Beaman, C. Philip

10.1037/a0037779

Tipo

Article

PeerReviewed