Los intereses estratégicos de EEUU, Rusia, China y Japón como determinantes de la estrategia de mantenimiento de la Estructura en la Península Coreana. 2003-2013.
| Contribuinte(s) |
Sahid Garnica, German Alberto |
|---|---|
| Data(s) |
19/03/2015
|
| Resumo |
El propósito principal de esta monografía es ofrecer una perspectiva crítica sobre el conflicto latente en la Península Coreana, haciendo un acercamiento al mismo desde un marco teórico asentado en el realismo estructural de Kenneth Waltz. De este modo, se busca responder a cuestiones sobre los intereses estatales como fundamento básico de las estrategias de mantenimiento de la Estructura en regiones geopolíticamente sensibles. Al final, se llega a la conclusión afirmando que la Estructura ejerce una serie de funciones para garantizar su preservación mediante una acción de convergencia en la conducta de los Estados. Esta realidad ha mantenido a la Península Coreana sin un conflicto bélico en los últimos 50 años, muy a pesar de estar al borde del mismo en varias ocasiones, ya que de llegarse a presentar se rompería la estabilidad de la región, y por ende el Equilibrio de Poderes estaría en grave riesgo. The main goal of this monograph is offering a new and critical perspective on the ongoing conflict in Korean Peninsula, having an approach from Kenneth Waltz’s Structural Realism theory. Through this way, what is looked is answering some questions about State’s interests as a basis for Structure maintenance in some geopolitically essential regions in the World. At the end a conclusion is reached, telling that Structure applies some functions for preserving itself from disappearing as it is known by the means of a convergence action in States’ behaviour. This reality has gone on keeping the Korean Peninsula without a military conflict during the last 50 years, despite the fact it has been at the edge many times. In the case this happens, stability in the region would break down and thus the Balance of Power does. |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador | |
| Idioma(s) |
spa |
| Publicador |
Facultad de Relaciones Internacionales |
| Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Fonte |
instname:Universidad del Rosario reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR CESEDEN. (2010). Evolución del Concepto de Interés Nacional. Madrid: Ministerio de Defensa. De Ceuster, K., y Melissen, J. (Eds.). (2008). Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Six Parties, Six Perspectives. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations 'Clingendael'. East Asia Foundation; Jeju Peace Institute. (2010). Shaping New Regional Governance in East Asia [Vol. II]: A Common Vision for Mutual Benefit and Common Prosperity. Seoul: Russian Embassy. Harnisch, S. (2012). The changing dynamics of Conflict Resolution on the Korean peninsula: The role of domestic politics in North Korea, the US and the PR China. Tokio: Japanese-German Dialogue on Security and Non-Proliferation. Ick Lew, Y. (2000). Brief History of Korea: A Bird's-EyeView. New York: The Korea Society. NAHF. (2007). Korean History for International Citizens. Seoul: Northeast Asian History Foundation. Sodupe, K. (2003). La teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales a comienzos del siglo XXI. Bilbao: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco. Thielmann, G. (2013). Sorting Out the Nuclear and Missile Threats From North Korea. Washington D.C.: The Arms Control Association. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Michigan: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Zhongying, P. (2009). The Six-Party Process, Regional Security Mechanisms, and China-U.S. Cooperation: Toward a New Regional Security Mechanism for a New Northeast Asia? Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution Capítulos o Artículos en libros Auslin, M. R. (2011). Japanese Perspectives on the Six-Party Talks and the North Korean Nulear Crisis. En KEI, Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies 2011 (págs. 195-205). Washington D.C.: Korean Economic Institute. Blank, S. (2011). Russia and the Six-Party Process in Korea. In KEI, Joint U.S.-Korea Academic Studies 2011 (págs. 207-226). Washington D.C.: Korean Economic Institute. Cerami, J. R. (2011). From the Six-Party Talks to a Northeast Asian Security Regime? Cooperative Threat Reduction Strategies and Institutional Development. En KEI, Challenges Posed by the DPRK for the Alliance and the Region (págs. 59-77). Washington D.C.: The Korea Economic Institute. Evans, P. (2007). Constructing Multilateralism in an Anti-Region: From Six Party Talks to a Regional Security Framework in Northeast Asia? En G. Shin, y D. Snyder (Eds.), Cross Currents: Regionalism and Nationalism in Northeast Asia (págs. 99-116). Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Kang, S. M. (2006). Six-Party Talks: The Other Four. En U. I. SAIS, 2006 US-Korea Yearbook (págs. 87-94). Baltimore: John Hopkins SAIS. Lobell, S. E. (2010). Structural Realism/Offensive and Defensive Realism. En R. A. Ed. Denemark, The International Studies Encyclopedia (págs. 6651-6669). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Martin, S. B. (2003). From Balance of Power to Balancing Behavior: The Long and Winding Road. En A. K. Hanami, Perspectives on Structural Realism (págs. 61-81). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2013). Structural Realism. En T. Dunne, M. Kurki, S. Smith, y Eds., International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity (págs. 77-93). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nae-Young, L. (2011). South Korea and the U.S.-ROK Alliance. En KEI, Challenges posed by the DPRK for the Alliance and the Region (págs. 1-11). Washington D.C.: Korea Economic Institute. Nanto, D. K. (2011). Increasing Dependency: North Korea’s Economic Relations with China. En K. E. Institute, Korea’s Economy 2011 (págs. 75-83). Washington: Korea Economic Institute of America. Okano-Heijmans, M. (2008). Japan and the Multilateral Talks: Peripheral Player, Powerful Spoiler. En K. De Ceuster, y J. Melissen (Eds.), Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Six Parties, Six Perspectives (págs. 71-82). The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations 'Clingendael'. van der Meer, S. (2008). Russia: Many Goals, Little Activity. En K. De Ceuster, y J. Melissen (Eds.), Ending the North Korean Nuclar Crisis: Six Parties, Six Perspectives (págs. 83-88). The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations 'Clingendael'. van der Putten, F.-P. (2008). China: Learning To Be a Great Power? En K. De Ceuster, y J. Melissen (Eds.), Ending the North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Six Parties, Six Perspectives (págs. 59-70). The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations 'Clingendael'. Waltz, K. (2003). The Anarchic Structure of World Politics. En J. Art, y R. E. Jervis, International Politics. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc. Artículos en publicaciones periódicas académicas. Aburto, H. (1994). El Interés nacional (Planteamiento estratégico). Revista de Administración Pública (86), 79-87. Byung Chul, K. (2003). Six-Party Talks: The Last Chance for Peace? East Asian Review, 15(4), 3-22. Celaya, R., y Villarreal, A. (2007). Comprensión geopolítica de Corea del Sur: desarrollo, tendencias y perspectivas. PORTES, 1(1), 7-24. Choi, J. (2006). The North Korean Domestic Situation and Its Impact on the Nuclear Crisis. Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies, 5, 1-18. Frigg, R., y Votsis, I. (2011). Everything you always wanted to know about structural realism but were afraid to ask. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 227-276. Hecker, S. S. (2010). Lessons learned from the North Korean nuclear crises. Dædalus, 139(1), 44-56. Hernández, S. (2008). La Teoría del Realismo Estructuralista y las Interacciones entre los Estados en el Escenario Internacional. Revista Venezolana de Análisis de Coyuntura, XIV(2), 13-29. James, P. (1995). Structural Realism and the Causes of War. Mershon International Studies Review, 39(2), 181-208. Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167-214. Nakato, S. (2009). Six Party Talks: The Sixth Round Talks and its Future Prospect. Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies, 22(1), 89-99. Park, J. S. (2005, Autumn). Inside Multilateralism: The Six-Party Talks. The Washington Quarterly, 28(4), 75-91. Rangismaporn, P. (2009). Russian Perceptions and Policie in a Multipolar Eas Asia under Yeltsin and Putin. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 9(2), 230-234. Salomón, M. (2002). La Teoría de las Relaciones Internacionales en los Albores del Siglo XXI: Diálogo, Disidencia, Aproximaciones. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, (2), 1-59. Snyder, S., y Byun, S.-W. (2011). Cheonan and Yeonpyeong: The Northeast Asian Response to North Korea's Provocations. Rusi Journal, 156(2), 74-81. Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5-41. Yongchool, H., y Beomshik, S. (2008). Non-proliferation and Political Interests: Russia’s Policy Dilemmas in the Six-party Talks. Non-Proliferation And Political Interests, 173-197. Artículos en publicaciones periódicas no académicas. North Korea 'faces food crisis. En BBC News. (2008, Abril 16). Retrieved Noviembre 5, 2013. Disponible en: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7349975.stm Gladstone, R., y Sanger, D. New Sanctions on North Korea Pass in Unified U.N. Vote. En The New York Times (2013, Marzo 7). Disponible en: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/08/world/asia/north-korea-warns-of-pre-emptive-nuclear-attack.html?_r=0 Hotham, O. Putin wants Six Party Talks “without preconditions”. En NK·News.Org (2013, Noviembre 12). Disponible en: http://www.nknews.org/2013/11/putin-wants-six-party-talks-without-preconditions/ Isidore, C. U.S. companies dump billions into China. En CNN Money (2011, Enero 20). Disponible en: http://money.cnn.com/2011/01/20/news/international/us_business_chinese_investment_boom/ Rapoza, K. Is China's Ownership Of U.S. Debt A National Security Threat? En Forbes (2013, Enero 23). Disponible en: http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2013/01/23/is-chinas-ownership-of-u-s-debt-a-national-security-threat/ Otros documentos Bajoria, J., y Xu, B. (2013, Septiembre 30). The Six Party Talks on North Korea's Nuclear Program. En Council on Foreign Relations. Disponible en: http://www.cfr.org/proliferation/six-party-talks-north-koreas-nuclear-program/p13593 Candelas C., M. (2013, Abril 7). El conflicto de Corea: el imaginario geopolítico dominante y el comportamiento de los seis actores principales. En Política Crítica Revista Digital. Disponible en: politicacritica.com/2013/04/07/el-conflicto-de-corea-el-imaginario-geopolitico-dominante-en-el-comportamiento-de-los-seis-actores-estatales-principales/ Chanlett-Avery, E., y Rinehart, I. E. (2013). North Korea: U.S. Relations, Nuclear Diplomacy, and Internal Situation. Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Chanlett-Avery, E., y Squassoni, S. (2006). North Korea’s Nuclear Test: Motivations, Implications, and U.S. Options. Washington D.C.: Congressional Research Service. Central Intelligence Agency [CIA]. (2014, Junio 20). South Korea. En CIA World Factbook. Disponible en: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ks.html Felician, S. (2011). North and South Korea: A Frozen Conflict on the Verge of Unfreezing? Istituto Affari Internazionali Working Papers, 1-14. Holloway, J. L. (2001, Mayo 18). Korean War. En US Navy. Consultado en diciembre 5, 2014. Disponible en: http://www.navy.mil/navco/pages/ssp/reference/korean-war.pdf ICG. (2009). North Korea’S Nuclear And Missile Programs, Asia Report N°168. Seoul-Brussels: International Crisis Group IINOR. (2012). Six-Party Talks. Monterey, California: Center for Nonproliferation Studies. Karam Enriquez, V. (2001) Kenneth Waltz 11 september 2001. En Mexico Diplomático 2001. Disponible en: http://www.mexicodiplomatico.org/art_diplomatico_especial/KennethWaltz.pdf Levin, J., y Milgrom, P. (2004). Introduction to Choice Theory. Stanford University, 1-25. Lin, L. (2006). The North Korean Nuclear Test and Its Implications. Washington D.C.: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute y Silk Road Studies Program, Johns Hopkins University-SAIS,. Locher, C. (2007). The conflict with North Korea / North Korea as a source of conflict: An analysis from a peace and conflict resolution studies perspective. (Tesis Doctoral) Berlin: FernUniversität Hagen. Peace and Conflict Resolution Studies. Recuperado en: http://www.humiliationstudies.org/documents/LocherDoctoralThesisCompleteVersion2.pdf Martin, M. (2009). The Six-Party Talks and New Opportunities to Strengthen Regional Nonproliferation and Disarmament Efforts. (págs. 1-24). Beijing: The Stanley Foundation; National Commitee on North Korea; China Arms Control and Disarmament Association; Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis. Disponible en: http://www.stanleyfoundation.org/publications/report/6partytalksrpt309.pdf Nikitin, M. B. (2013). North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons: Technical Issues. Washington: Congressional Research Service. Security Council - UN. (2009, Junio 12). Security Council, Acting Unanimously, Condemns in Strongest Terms Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Nuclear Test, Toughens Sanctions. En United Nations. Disponible en: http://www.un.org/press/en/2009/sc9679.doc.htm Six Party Talks Chairman. (2004, Febrero) Six Party Talk Documents Archive: Second Round Six Party Talks Chairman Statement. En The National Commitee on North Korea. Disponible en: http://www.ncnk.org/resources/briefing-papers/publications/ChairmanStatement_2ndRound_Sixparty.doc/file_view Statista. (2014, Diciembre 2). U.S. direct investment position in China from 2000 to 2013 (in billion U.S. dollars, on a historical-cost basis). En The Statistics Portal. Disponible en: http://www.statista.com/statistics/188629/united-states-direct-investments-in-china-since-2000/ Sung-Chool, L. (2011). The ROK-US. Joint Political and Military Response to North Korean Armed Provocations. Washington D.C.: CSIS (Center for Strategic & International Studies). Zhang, H. (2005). Chinese Perspectives on the North Korean Nuclear Issue. Institute for Nuclear Materials Management 46th Annual Meeting (págs. 1-8). Phoenix, Az.: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. TRI |
| Palavras-Chave | #Relaciones internacionales #Estados Unidos - Relaciones exteriores - Corea #Rusia - Relacioes exteriores - Corea #Japón - Relaciones exteriores - Corea #327.519 #Structural Realism, Waltz, Korea, Geostrategic Interests, Convergence Action. |
| Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
