¿Impactó el programa de Tutores Pares a sus tutores?


Autoria(s): Peñaloza Lopez, Ivan Felipe; Ordoñez Pinilla, Karen Alexandra
Contribuinte(s)

Isaza-Restrepo, Andres

Data(s)

04/11/2014

Resumo

Introducción: El programa de Tutores Pares-TP es una iniciativa creada en la EMCS de la Universidad del Rosario que brinda acompañamiento académico a través de estudiantes-tutores a pares menos avanzados. Éste entrega a sus Tutores sistemáticamente, herramientas para desempeñarse armónicamente en el ejercicio de guía y provee habilidades para el manejo del saber. Este estudio busca explorar posibles ´impactos´ generados tras la participación de estudiantes de medicina como TPs dentro de un programa estructurado. Materiales y métodos: Estudio cualitativo que involucró la construcción y aplicación de encuestas a grupos focales –TPs, Docentes y Familiares- creadas a partir de seis ejes/categorías que enmarcan al médico ideal. Las respuestas obtenidas de preguntas cerradas –en escala valorativa- y de naturaleza abierta fueron sometidas a análisis descriptivo –modas- y triangulación. Resultados: 41 tutores, agrupados en 4 grupos de análisis, evidenciaron un impacto general positivo con predominio en habilidades interpersonales (60%,65%,66%,45%, respectivamente), funciones/actividades basadas en la práctica y mejoramiento (57%,67%,60%,45%) y la forma como se emplean los conocimientos (47%,70%,67%,48%). Ocho docentes encuestados consideraron relevante el impacto del programa en habilidades interpersonales-(49%), conocimientos-(42%) y la interacción con colegas-(38%). En los padres de familia hay consenso en el cambio en habilidades interpersonales, funciones basadas en la práctica y mejoramiento y en actitudes-valores ético/morales. Dichos resultados están en paralelo con las observaciones plasmadas en las preguntas abiertas. Conclusiones: Se evidenció un impacto general positivo en la formación y desempeño profesional tras la participación como TPs dentro del programa; hallazgo que soporta aquellos publicados de experiencias académicas similares.

Introduction: The program of Tutores Pares-TP is an academic initiative created in the School of Medicine of Universidad del Rosario which provides support made by peer tutors to less advanced students. It gives to its tutors several tools to perform harmoniously their tasks and provides skills for managing knowledge. The aim of this study is to explore potential impacts generated after the involvement of medical students as TPs within a structured program. Methods: Qualitative study that involved the construction and application of surveys to focus groups -Tps, Teachers and relatives- based on six axes / categories that frame the ideal physician. The answers obtained from closed and open questions underwent descriptive analysis and triangulation. Results: 41 peer tutors grouped into specific groups, showed an overall positive impact with relevance in interpersonal skills (60%, 65%, 66%, 45%, respectively) functions / and practice-based improvement activities (57% , 67%, 60%, 45%) and how knowledge (47%, 70%, 67%, 48%) are employed. Eight interviewed teachers considered significant impact in interpersonal skills (49%), knowledge- (42%) and interaction with colleagues (38%). For parents, there is a consensus on the change in interpersonal skills, practice-based functions and improvement in attitudes and in ethics. These results are in parallel with observations given in the open questions. Conclusions: An overall positive impact on training and professional performance was evident after participation in the program as TP, finding that supports those published in similar academic experiences.

Formato

application/pdf

Identificador

http://repository.urosario.edu.co/handle/10336/8999

Idioma(s)

spa

Publicador

Facultad de medicina

Direitos

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Fonte

instname:Universidad del Rosario

reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR

Isaza A. Enseñar y aprender a enseñar medicina desde una perspectiva no tradicional. Tesis para optar al título de Magíster en Educación – Universidad de los Andes. 2007.

http://www.urosario.edu.co/EMCS/ur/tutoresPares/.

Isaza A, Quiroga A, Roa C et al. Tutores pares en la facultad de medicina. Revista Ciencias de la Salud, 4, (Especial). 2006, 122-135.

Wong JG, Waldrep TD, Smith TG. Formal peer-teaching in medical school improves academic performance: the MUSC supplemental instructor program. Teach Learn Med. 2007; 19(3):216–220.

Sobral D.T. (2002) Cross-year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: conditions and outcomes for student tutors. Medical Education. 2003, 36:1064–1070.

Nikendei C., Andreesen S., Hoffmann K., Junger J. (2009) Cross-year peer tutoring on internal medicine wards: Effects on self-assessed clinical competencies – A group control design study. Medical Teacher. 2009, 31: e32–e35.

Whitman NA. Peer teaching: to teach is to learn twice. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report. Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education. 1988.

Peets AD, Coderre S, Wright B, et al. Involvement in teaching improves learning in medical students: a randomized cross-over study. BMC Med Educ. 2009; 9:55.

Solomon P, Crowe J. Perceptions of student peer tutors in a problem based learning programme. Med Teach. 2001; 23(2):181–186.

Batchelder AJ, Rodrigues CM, Lin LY, Hickey PM, Johnson C, Elias JE. The role of students as teachers: four years’ experience of a large-scale, peer-led programme. Med Teach. 2010;32(7):547–551.

Nestel D, Kidd J. Peer assisted learning in patient-centred interviewing: the impact on student tutors. Med Teach. 2005; 27(5):439–444.

Ten Cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007;29(6):591–599.

Tzu-Chieh Yu, Wilson N, Singh P et al. Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school. Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2011:2 157–172.)

Wong JG, Waldrep TD, Smith TG. Formal peer-teaching in medical school improves academic performance: the MUSC supplemental instructor program. Teach Learn Med. 2007; 19(3):216–220.

Soriano RP, Blatt B, Coplit L, et al. Teaching medical students how to teach: a national survey of students-as-teachers programs in US medical schools. Acad Med. 2010; 85(11):1725–1731.

GMC. Tomorrow’s Doctors: Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council; 2009.

Swing S.R. The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Medical Teacher. 2007, 29: 648–654.

GMC. The New Doctor: Recommendations on General Clinical Training. London: General Medical Council; 2003.

Coulter A. Patients’ views of the good doctor.BMJ 2002; 325: 668-9.

Huidobro D, Núñez F, Vargas P et al. Expectativas de estudiantes de medicina de pregrado en relación al perfil de médico esperado. Rev Méd Chile 2006; 134: 947-954

Toro A. Consideraciones acerca de las cualidades del buen médico y del profesionalismo en medicina. Acta Med Colomb 2011, Vol. 36 Nº 1.

Guzmán F, Franco E, Morales de Barrios M et al. El acto médico - Implicaciones éticas y legales. Acta Médica Colombiana 1994 Vol. 19 N° 3 ~ Mayo-Junio.

Papponetti M. La conducta médica ideal según los pacientes. Publicado en Diario Médico, Agosto de 2006. Disponible en: http://www.condignidad.org/la-conducta-mca-ideal-segos-pacientes.html

Narváez A, Sarmiento G. Habilidades clínicas en la formación del médico general. Propuesta de evaluación. Universidad del Cauca. 2005, Volumen 7 Numero 3.

Motilla M, Sánchez R, Curiel O et al. ¿Qué cualidades valoran más los Pacientes de su Médico de Familia?. REV CLÍN MED FAM 2009; 2 (6): 263-268

Smith KL, Petersen DJ, Soriano R, Friedman E, Bensinger LD. Tomorrow’s Teachers Today: a national medical student teaching and leadership retreat. Med Teach. 2007; 29(4):328–334.

Queenan JT. What is a good physician in this new era? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 750-1.

Levine C. The good doctor: the carer’s perspective. Clin Med 2004; 4: 244-5.

Schattner A, Rudin D, Jellin N. Good physicians from the perspective of their patients. BMC Health Services Research 2004; 4: 26,

Carroll L, Sullivan Fm, Colledge M. Good health care: patient and professional perspectives. Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48: 1507-8.

Shannon D, Bradshaw C. A comparision of response rate, response time, and costs of mail and electronic surveys. The Journal of Experimental Education. 2002 (70)2, 179-192.

Cook C, Heath F, Thompson R. A meta-analysis of response rates in web or internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60 No. 6, December 2000 821-836.

http://www.urosario.edu.co/EMCS/ur/grupo-profesores-(1)/

TEME

Palavras-Chave #Tutores (Educación) #610.7 #Educación médica #Medicina #Comprehensive training, collaborative work, peer learning, professional skills, medical education, peer tutors
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis

info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion