Implementación de estrategias de poder por parte de Irán, Turquía y Arabia Saudita en la disputa por la hegemonía de Medio Oriente. Periodo 2005-2012.
Contribuinte(s) |
Felipe Sahid, Germán Alberto |
---|---|
Data(s) |
03/10/2014
|
Resumo |
El interés de esta monografía es analizar las distintas estrategias políticas, económicas y militares que han implementado Irán, Turquía y Arabia Saudita en busca de la hegemonía de Medio Oriente. A lo largo del trabajo de investigación se analiza por medio del realismo ofensivo de John Mearsheimer las distintas estrategias de los tres Estados antes mencionados, con el fin de establecer la voluntad y las capacidades de cada uno para alcanzar la hegemonía regional. Finalmente, por medio de la medición de percepción de poder establecida por David Jablonsky se examinan las capacidades y la proyección de poder que poseen Irán, Turquía y Arabia Saudita para obtener la hegemonía de Medio Oriente. The interest of this paper is to analyze the different political, economic and military strategies that have implemented Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia seeking hegemony in the Middle East. Along the research is analyzed by means of offensive realism of John Mearsheimer different strategies of the three states mentioned above, in order to establish the will and capabilities of each to achieve regional hegemony. Finally, through the measurement of perception of power established by David Jablonsky are discussed skills and possessing power projection Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia to gain hegemony in the Middle East. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
spa |
Publicador |
Facultad de Relaciones Internacionales |
Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Fonte |
Jalife-Rahme, A. (2011). Las revoluciones árabes en curso el detonador alimentario global. Mexico D.F.: Grupo Editor Orfila. Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The tragedy of the great power politics. New York: Norton and Company Ltd. Palmer Harik, J. (2005). Hezbollah, The changing face of terrorism. New York: I.B. Tauris. Tréan, C. (2006). Irán, entre la amenaza nuclear y el sueño occidental. Barcelona: Editorial Penínsual . Kemp, G. (2012). Turkey, Russia, India, and China. En Gulf Kaleidoscope (pp. 74-87). Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies. Rashid, A. (2001). Chiítas y suníes. Irán y Arabia Saudí. En A. Rashid, Los talibán. Islam, petróleo y fundamentalismo en Asia Central (págs. 300-315). Barcelona: Ediciones Península. Barnekow, K. (2009). The foreign policy of Iran. En DIIS's Brief, 1-6. Burgess, R. (2010). Iran's military power. En Statement before the Committe on Armed Services United States Senate (pp. 1-15). Washington: Defense Intelligence Agency. CIDOB. (2011). Indicadores económicos y sociales de Turquía. En Anuario Internacional CIDOB 2011, 477-486. Colomo, J. (Junio de 2014). Paz o Victoria. Recuperado el 25 de Septiembre de 2014, de http://www.javiercolomo.com/index_archivos/Victor.pdf Dorff, R., & Cerami, J. (n.d.). Detrrence and Competitive Strategies: A New Look at an Old Concept. 1-15 Erb, A. (2008). La nueva era dorada de Arabia saudita. En Palermo Business Review, 19- 32 Fernández, A. (2014). El enfrentamiento sunnita-chiita, su reflejo en la tradicional rivalidad arabe-persa y su repercusión en Oriente Medio. Instituto Español de Estudios Estrategicos, 1-15. Haji-Yousefi, A. (2010). Iran's foreign policy during Ahmadinejad: from confrontation to accommodation. En Annual Conference of the Canadian Political Science Association, (pp. 1-25). Montreal. Jablonsky, D. (1997). National power. En Parameters, 34-54. Melchor, M. (2011). Arabia Saudita: ¿Estrategia de jaque o un jaque mate en toda regla?. En ANMO: África del Norte y Medio oriente, 61-86. Peréz, J. (2011). Irán y la guerra naval asimetrica. En Revista General de la Marina, 87-94 Salehzadeh, A. (2013). Iran's domestic and foreign policies. En National Defence University, 1-37. The Military Balance . (2006). Middle East and North Africa. The Military Balnace, 165- 216. The Military Balnace. (2006). Europe. The Military Balnace, 47-146. The Military Balnace. (2007). Europe. The Military Balnace 2007, 93-186 The Military Balnace. (2007). MIddle East and North Africa. The Military Balnace 2007, 207-252. The Military Balnace. (2008). Europe. The Military Balnace 2008, 101-204. The Military Balnace. (2008). Middle East and North Africa. The Military Balnace 2008, 225-272. The Military Balnace. (2009). Chapter three: Europe. The Military Balnace 2009, 99-206. The Military Balnace. (2009). Middle East and North Africa. The Military Balnace 2009, 229-276. The Military Balance. (2010). Middle East and North Africa. Military Balnace 2010, 235- 282. The Military Balnace. (2010). Chapter three: Europe. The Military Balnace 2010, 103-210 The Military Balnace. (2011). Chapter four: Europe. The Military Balnace 2011, 73-172. The Military Balnace. (2011). Chapter seven: Middle East and North Africa. The Military Balnace, 293-342. The Military Balance. (2012). Europe. The Military Balance, 71-182 The Military Balance. (2012). Middle East and North Africa. The Military Balnace 2012, 303-360. The Military Balnace. (2013). Chapter seven: Middle East and North Africa . The Military Balnace 2013, 353-414. The Military Balnace. (2014). Chapter four: Europe. The Military Balnace 2014, 59-160 The Military Balnace. (2014). Chapter seven: Middle East and North Africa. The Military Balnace 2014, 297-354. Torumtay, N. (2009). Turkey's Military Doctrine. En Central and Easter European Online Library , 256-264. Wehrey, F. (2012). What's behind Saudi Arabia's nuclear anxiety. CERI strategy papers, 1- 8. El País. (2011, diciembre 04). La OTAN admite la pérdida de un avión tras aunciar Irán el derribo de un “drone”. El País. Disponible en: internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2011/12/04/actualidad/1323013542_630753. html Al Faisal, T. (2013). Saudi Arabia's New Foreign Policy Doctrine in the aftermath of the Arab Awakening. (pp. 1-9). Cambridge: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs John F Kennedy School Of Goverment Harvar University.l Blanchard, C. (2014). Saudi Arabia: Background and U.S. Relations. Washington: Congressional Reseatch service. Blanchard, C. (2010). Saudi Arabia: Background and U.S. Relations. Washington: Congressional research Service. Cordesman, A., & Al-Rodhan, K. (2006). The Gulf Military Forces in an Era of Asymmetric War. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies. Cordesman, A., & Obaid, N. (2004). Saudi Military Forces and Development: Challenges and Reforms. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies. Grigoriadis, I. (2010). The Davutoglu Doctrine and Turkish Foreign Policy. Hellenic Fondation for European and Foreign Policy Ilias, S. (2010). Iran´s Economic Conditions: U.S. Policy Issues. Washington: Congressional Research Service. NATO. (2013, febrero 19). NATO support Turkey: Background and timeline. Retrieved febrero 16, 2014, from North Atlantic Treaty Organization: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_92555.htm?selectedLocale=en OTAN. (1949, abril 4). Tratado del Atlántico Norte. Retrieved febrero 15, 2014, from http://www.ehu.es/ceinik/tratados/14TRATADOSDEALIANZASPOLITICOMILI TARES/TAPM142ESP.pdf Zanotti, J. (2011). Turkey-U.S. Defense Cooperation: Prospects and challeges. Congressional Research Service. Zanotti, J. (2013). Turkey: Background and U.S. Relations. Congressional Research Service. TRI |
Palavras-Chave | #Relaciones internacionales #Poder (Ciencias sociales) #Irán - Política y gobierno #Turquía - Política y gobierno #Arabia Saudita - Política y gobierno #327.55 #Power, power projection, regional hegemony, self-help strategies. |
Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |