Validación diagnóstica del test neural 1 para el síndrome de túnel del carpo
| Contribuinte(s) |
Rueda, María Clemencia Ibáñez-Pinilla, Milcíades |
|---|---|
| Data(s) |
08/07/2014
|
| Resumo |
El objetivo de este estudio fue realizar una prueba de validez diagnostica del test neural 1 para el diagnóstico del Síndrome de Túnel del Carpo (STC) utilizando como prueba de referencia o de oro el test de conducción nerviosa. En este estudio participaron 115 sujetos, 230 manos con sospecha clínica de STC quienes fueron evaluados con el test de conducción nerviosa y el test neural 1. Se encontró una sensibilidad del 93.0% (IC 95%:88,21-96,79) y una especificidad del 6,67% (IC 95%:0,0-33,59), razón de verosimilitud positiva fue de 1,00 y razón de verosimilitud negativa de 1,05. Valor predictivo positivo de 86,9% y un valor predictivo negativo de 12,5%. Se concluye que el test neural 1 es una prueba clínica de alta sensibilidad y baja especificidad de gran utilidad para el monitoreo e identificación del STC. Es un procedimiento para el diagnóstico clínico de bajo costo que puede incluirse en los exámenes de rutina de los trabajadores como complemento a las pruebas clínicas sugeridas por las Gatiso para dar mayor precisión a la identificación temprana del STC. Se sugiere combinarla con otros test de mayor especificidad para ser aplicada en trabajadores en condiciones de riesgo o que presenten síntomas en miembros superiores y realizar otros estudios en donde participen sujetos sin diagnóstico clínico del STC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the neural test 1 for the diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) using the nerve conduction test as the reference test. In 115 subjects, 230 hands with suspected CTS Patients were evaluated with a test of nerve conduction and neural test 1. A sensitivity of 93 % (95 % CI) and specificity of 6.67 % was found (95 %), positive likelihood ratio was 1.04 and negative likelihood ratio of 1.00. Positive predictive value of 86.9 % and a negative predictive value of 12.5%. This research suggests the application of neural test 1 as a screening test for the detection of STC with other more specific test to be applied to workers in hazardous conditions or with symptoms in the upper limbs. As a recommendation for future studies suggested the participation of subjects no clinical diagnosis of CTS. |
| Formato |
application/pdf |
| Identificador | |
| Idioma(s) |
spa |
| Publicador |
Facultad de medicina |
| Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Fonte |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR instname:Universidad del Rosario 1 Stapleton MJ. Occupation and carpal tunnel syndrome. Anz Journal of Surgery. 2006 Jun; 76(6): 494– 496 2 Dale AM, Lipscomb H, Gaal J et al.Prevalence and incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome in US working populations: pooled analysis of six prospective. Scan J Work Environ Health 2013; 39(5): 495 – 505 3 GATISO: Guías de Atención Integral en Salud Ocupacional Basada en Evidencia. Ministerio de la Protección Social 2007; 44 – 49. 4 De Krom M, Kestrel A, Knipschild PG. Carpal tunnel syndrome: prevalence in the general population. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992; 45:373–376. 5 Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornsein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999 Jul 14;282(2):153– 158. 6 Franklin ET al. Occupacional carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Washington State, 1984 – 1988. American Journal public health. June 1991; 81.6: 741-46. 7 Concha M, Labbé J. Enfermedades Profesionales: Una Aproximación a su Frecuencia. Ciencia & Trabajo 2007; Número 25; 117-120. 8 Werner RA, Franzblau A, Gell N, Hartigan AG, Ebersole M, Armstrong TJ. Incidence of carpal tunnel syndrome among automobile assembly workers and assessment of risk factors. J Occup Environ Med. 2005; 47:1044–1050. 9 Jenkins PJ, Srikantharajah D, Duckworth AD, Watts AC, McEachan JE. Carpal tunnel yndrome: the association with occupation at a population level. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013 Jan; 38 (1):67–72. 10 Werner RA, Franzblau A, Gell N. Randomized controlled trial of nocturnal splinting for active workers with symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86:1–7. 11 Werner RA, Franzblau A, Gell N. Randomized controlled trial of nocturnal splinting for active workers with symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86:1–7. 12 Tafur F. Informe de enfermedad profesional en Colombia 2001-2002. Grupo de fomento de salud de los trabajadores. Bogotá: Ministerio de Protección Social de Colombia; 2005. 13 Informe Ejecutivo de la Segunda Encuesta Nacional de Condiciones de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo en el Sistema General de Riesgos Laborales de Colombia. Ministerio de Trabajo; 2013. 14 FASECOLDA, Cámara Técnica de Riesgos Profesionales .Sistema Información Gremial. 2010. Consultado en http://es.scribd.com/doc/86530615/Estadisticas-segun-fasecolda el 24 de julio de 2012. 15 Chamagne Philippe. Functional dystonia in musicians: rehabilitation. Hand Clinics .2003, 19. 309-10. 16 De Krom MC, Knipshild PG, Kester AD, Spaans F. Efficacy of provocative tests for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Lancet 1990; 17 (335):393 - 5. 17 MacDermid JC, Doherty T. Clinical and electrodiagnostic testing of carpal tunnel syndrome: a narrative review. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 2004; 34 (10):565-88. 18 Descatha A, Dale AM, Franzblau A, Coomes J, Evanoff B. Diagnostic strategies using physical examination are minimally useful in defining carpal tunnel syndrome in population-based research studies. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2010;67:133 - 5. 19 Schmid, A, Brunner F, Luomajoki H, Held U, Bachmann L, Künzer1S Coppieter M. Reliability of clinical tests to evaluate nerve function and mechanosensitivity of the upper limb peripheral nervous system. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. July 2009; 10 .11: 1-9. 20 Shacklock, M, Gimenez Donoso, C, Lucha López M. Hacia un enfoque clínico-científico en el diagnóstico con test neurodinámicos (tensión neural). Fisioterapia 2007; 29(6):288-97. 21 Shacklock M. Clinical application of neurodynamics. En: Shacklock. M, editor. Moving in on pain. Sydney: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1995. p. 123-31. 22 Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, Miller RG, Quartly CA, Vennix MJ, et al. Practice parameter: electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Report of the American Association of electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology 2002 Jun 11;58(11):1589-92. 23 Vanti C, Bonfiglioli R, Calabrese M, Marinelli F, Guccione C, Saverio F et al. Upper limb neurodynamic test 1 and symptoms reproduction in carpal tunnel syndrome. A validity study. Manual Therapy 16. 2011. 258 - 63. 24 Naranjo M, Reyes Y, Castellanos Y. Comparación de la utilización de pruebas semiológicas vs neuroconducción para el diagnóstico del síndrome Revista ASCOFI, Vol. 50, Año 2005;20-25. 25 Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Delitto A, Allison S, Boninger ML. Development of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Archives of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine.2005 Apr; 86(4):609-18. 26 Lohkamp M,Small K. Normal response to Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1 and 2A. Manual Therapy 16.2011;125 - 30. 27 American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. American Academy of Neurology American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: summary statement. Muscle Nerve. 2002:25:918-22 28 Nakamichi K,Tachibana S Ultrasonographic measurement of median nerve cross-sectional area in idiopathic carpa tunnel syndrome: diagnostic accuracy. Muscle & Nerve. 2002: 798-803. 29 Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Delitto A, Allison S, Boninger ML. Development of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Archives of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2005 Apr; 86(4):609-18. 30 Vanti C, Bonfiglioli R, Calabrese M, Marinelli F, Guccione C, Saverio F et al. Upper limb neurodynamic test 1 and symptoms reproduction in carpal tunnel syndrome. A validity study. Manual Therapy 16 2011; 258 - 263. 31 Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Delitto A, Allison S, Boninger ML. Development of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Archives of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2005 Apr; 86 (4):609-618. 32 Burke DT, Burke MAM, Bell R, et al. subjective swelling: a new sign for carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil.1999; 78:504 - 508 33 Miedany et al. Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: Old tests new concepts. Joint Bone Spine 75. 2008; 451 - 457. 34 Miedany et al. Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: Old tests new concepts. Joint Bone Spine 75 2008; 451 - 457. 35 Werner RA, Franzblau A, Gell N. Randomized controlled trial of nocturnal splinting for active workers with symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86:1–7. |
| Palavras-Chave | #Síndrome del túnel del carpo #Median nerve, reproducibility of the results, neurological examination, clinical diagnosis |
| Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
