Proceso de negociación del tratado sobre el comercio de armas: tensiones y dinámicas de poder
Contribuinte(s) |
Joya, Ana Catalina |
---|---|
Data(s) |
27/03/2014
|
Resumo |
El interés del presente estudio de caso es analizar la articulación de las dinámicas de poder y estrategias de negociación detrás de un proceso tan complejo como el de la creación del Tratado sobre el Comercio de Armas.El estudio examina la evolución de las tensiones principales entre los Estados participantes frente al Tratado y resalta las lógicas de poder al interior de las negociaciónes, así como los factores externos que influyeron para solucionar o agravar dichas tensiones. Con el apoyo de diferentes conceptos teóricos de negociación, se observa en específico el rol de las coaliciones como una importante estrategia utilizada por Estados pequeños para contrarrestar de alguna forma la asimetría de poder en un escenario donde los grandes exportadores e importadores de armas en la negociación tienen mayor peso. The interest of this case study is to analyze the logics of power and negotiation strategies immersed in a complex process such as the creation of the Arms Trade Treaty. Therefore, the study examines the evolution of the tensions between participating States concerning the content of the Treaty, highlighting power logics within the negotiations and the external factors that contributed to the resolution or exacerbation of these tensions. Based on different theoretical concepts of negotiation, the study analyses the specific role of coalitions as a crucial strategy used by small states to somehow counterbalance the asymmetry of power in a scenario where the major exporters and importers of arms have greater weight in the negotiation. |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
spa |
Publicador |
Facultad de Relaciones Internacionales |
Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Fonte |
instname:Universidad del Rosario reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR Gillis, M. (2012). Disarmament, a basic guide. Nueva York: United Nations. Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs United Nations Ofice for Disarmament Affairs. (2011). Towards an Arms Trade Treaty. The United Nations Disarmament Yearbook (págs. 106-108). Nueva York: United Nations. Bottom W., et. al. (2000) Negotiating a Coalition: Risk, Quota Shaving, and Learning to Bromley, M. (2013, Abril). China's Arms Trade Treaty diplomacy. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Disponible en: http://books.sipri.org/files/misc/SIPRI-Hu%20Bromley.PDF Burkardt, N., et. al. (1997). Power Distribution in Complex Environmental Negotiations: Does Balance Matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2), 247-275. Charbonneau, L. (2013a, marzo 26). What's at stake in U.N. arms trade treaty negotiations? Reuters. Disponible en: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/26/us-arms-treaty-un-idUSBRE92P16Q20130326 Charbonneau, L. (2013b, Marzo 28). Iran, North Korea, Syria block U.N. arms trade treaty. Reuters. Dsiponible en: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/29/us-arms-treaty-un-idUSBRE92R10E20130329 Clinton, H. (2009, octubre 14). U.S. Support for the Arms Trade Treaty U.S. Department of State. Disponible en: http://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2009a/10/130573.htm Holtom, Paul et al. (2012a). Trends in International Transfers, 2011. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Disponible en: http://books.sipri.org/product_info?c_product_id=443 Joseph, C. (2013). Reflections from the Arms Trade Treaty Negotiations: CARICOM Punching and Succeeding Above their Wieght. Caribbean Journal of International Relations & Diplomacy , 1(1), 93-109. Kerry, J. (2013a, Septiembre 25). United States Signs Arms Trade Treaty on September 25, 2013. U.S. Department of State. Disponible en: http://www.state.gov/t/isn/armstradetreaty/ Perlo-Freeman, S. (2012, April 2). Trends in World Military Expenditure. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Disponible en: http://books.sipri.org/files/FS/SIPRIFS1304.pdf Pfetsch, F. R. (2011). Power in International Negotiations: Symmetry and Asymmetry. Négociations, 16, 39-56. Disponible en: http://www.cairn.info/resume.php?ID_ARTICLE=NEG_016_0039 Stohl, R. (2010, Abril). U.S. Policy and the Arms Trade Treaty. Chatam House Disponible en: http://ploughshares.arpi.ca/wpcontent/uploads/2012/08/WP10.1.pdf Zartman, W. I. (1997). The Structuralist Dilemma in Negotiation. Research on Negotiations in Organizations, (6), 227-245. Deitelhoff, N., y Wallbott, L. (2012). Beyond soft balancing: small states and coalition building in the ICC and climate change negotiations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25 (3), 345-366. Habeeb, W. M. (1990). Power and Tactics in International Negotiations: How Weak Nations Bargain with Strong Nations. Baltimore. Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique, 23 (1), 198-199. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3228271 Higgot R. & Fenton A. (1990) Middle Power Leadership and Coalition Building: Australia, the Cairns Group, and the Uruguay Round of Trade Negotiations. International Organization, 44(4) 589-632 Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706854 Panke, D. (2012a). Dwarfs in international negotiations: how small states make their voices heard. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25(3), 313-328. Disponible en:http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09557571.2012.710590?journalCode=ccam20#preview Panke, D. (2012b). Small states in multilateral negotiations. What have we learned? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 5 (3), 387-398. Disponible en: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09557571.2012.710589#preview Prakash, R. (2013, febrero). India’s security interests and the Arms Trade Treaty. Observer Research Foundation, 38, 1-30. Disponible en: http://www.orfonline.org/cms/sites/orfonline/modules/occasionalpaper/attachments/occasional_38_1362389569880.pdf Acheson, R. (2013a, marzo 28). A tale of two treaties. ATT Monitor, 6 (9). Disponible en: http://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/att/monitor/ATTMonitor6.9.pdf Chernyshova, D. (2013, septiembre 27). Russia says no to arms trade treaty in present form. The BRICS post. Disponible en: http://thebricspost.com/russia-says-no-to-global-arms-treaty-in-present-form/#.UwwkI17noXw Holtom, P. & Bromley, M. (2013, julio). Next steps for the arms trade treaty: securing an early entry into force. Arms Control Association. Disponible en: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2013_06/Next-Steps-for-the-Arms-Trade-Treaty_Securing-Early-Entry-Into-Force#5 Perlo-Freeman, S. (2012, April 2). Trends in World Military Expenditure. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Disponible en: http://books.sipri.org/files/FS/SIPRIFS1304.pdf Pratyiush. (2013, abril 12). U.N.’s arms treaty: a sore spot for India’s military. The Diplomat. Disponible en: http://thediplomat.com/2013/04/un-arms-treaty-a-sore-spot-for-indias-military/ Prizeman, K. (2013a, abril 2). Looking to the future of the ATT: shifting attention to implementation. ATT Monitor, 6 (11). Disponible en: http://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/att/monitor/ATTMonitor6.11.pdf Stavrianakis, A. (2013, mayo 29). Progressives, Pariahs and Sceptics: Who’s Who in the Arms Trade Treaty? e-International Relations. Disponible en: http://www.e-ir.info/2013/05/29/progressives-pariahs-and-sceptics-whos-who-in-the-arms-trade-treaty/ Bromley, M. (2013, Abril). China's Arms Trade Treaty diplomacy. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Disponible en: http://books.sipri.org/files/misc/SIPRI-Hu%20Bromley.PDF Holtom, Paul et al. (2012a). Trends in International Transfers, 2011. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Disponible en: http://books.sipri.org/product_info?c_product_id=443 Moreau, V. (2011). Le Traité sur le commerce des armes: les enjeux pour le 2012. EU non proliferation consortium. Disponible en: http://www.nonproliferation.eu/documents/other/virginiemoreau4f718116ed3cc.pdf Patrick, S. M. (2013, marzo 28). The Internationalist: The Final conference on the Arms Trade Treaty. Council on Foreign Relations. Disponible en: http://blogs.cfr.org/patrick/2013/03/28/the-final-conference-on-the-arms-trade-treaty/ TRI |
Palavras-Chave | #Poder (Ciencias sociales) #Tratados #Armamentos #Ciencia política #327.174 #Arms Trade Treaty, multilateral negotiation, coalitions, asymmetry. |
Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |