Evaluación a largo plazo en mujeres tratadas con laser para depilación facial en uniláser medica
Contribuinte(s) |
Ríos-Mora, Carlos-Adrian |
---|---|
Data(s) |
12/12/2012
|
Resumo |
El vello facial no deseado es un problema común en las mujeres, los tratamientos láser han mostrado efectividad para su manejo. Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados de la depilación láser en cara de las pacientes tratadas a largo plazo (20 sesiones o más ) luego de un seguimiento de 6 meses durante los años 1997 y 2012. Metodología: 55 mujeres que con tipo de piel II a V recibieron 20 o más sesiones de láser con seguimiento mayor a 6 meses posterior al la última sesión. Resultados: la edad promedio fue (32 ± 9,3 años), el 18,2 % presentaban SOP o Hiperandrogenismo el número de sesiones en cara fue de (30,84 ± 12,132), un promedio de disparos de (6,330 ± 7,804), los Kilojulios acumulados tuvieron un promedio de (126,5 ± 161,4) la fluencia promedio fue (18,5 ± 3,2 Julios/cm2), el láser de Alexandrita fue utilizado en el 98% de las pacientes. Se encontró cambios significativos entre el conteo inicial y el final de vello facial (484,9 ± 568.9 (med=300) vs. 103,33± 138,63 (med=60), p<0.001, Test de Wilcoxon). El 32.7% mostraron reducción > 90% (5,5% reducción del 100%). Conclusión : El tratamiento con de depilación con láser mostro una reducción significativa del vello facial, en mujeres mayores de 14 años con un tratamiento a largo plazo (20 sesiones o más), con una tasa de reducción mayor del 90% en 32.7% de las pacientes y un promedio de reducción del grupo de 79,36 ±15,51 %, similar a lo reportado en los diferentes estudios (77%). Introduction: Unwanted facial hair is a common problem in women, laser treatments have proven effective for handling Objective: To evaluate the results of laser hair removal on the face of patients treated long-term (20 sessions or more). Methods: 55 women with skin types II to V received 20 or more sessions of laser tracking more than 6 months after the last session. Results The mean age was (32 ± 9.3 years), 18.2% had PCOS or hyperandrogenism the number of sessions in face were (30.84 ± 12.132), an average of shots (6.330 ± 7.804) The accumulated Kilojoules averaged (126.5 ± 161.4) the fluence (Joules/cm2) average was (18.5 ± 3.2 Joules/cm2), the Alexandrite laser was used in 98% of patients. There were significant changes between the initial and the final count of facial hair (489,9 ± 568.9) (med=300) vs 103,33 ± 138,63 (med=60), p<0,001, Wilcoxon`s Test). The 32,7% showed >90% reduction, (5.5% reduction of 100%) . Conclusion: treatment with laser hair removal showed a significant reduction of facial hair in women over 14 years with a long-term treatment (20 sessions or more), with a rate of greater than 90% reduction in 32,7% of patients and an average reduction of 79.36 % ± 15,51% similar to that reported in different studies (77%). |
Formato |
application/pdf |
Identificador | |
Idioma(s) |
spa |
Publicador |
Facultad de Medicina |
Direitos |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
Fonte |
reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR instname:Universidad del Rosario 1. Dawber RP. Guidance for the management of hirsutism. Curr Med Res Opin 21(8):1227-34 (2005 Aug). 2. Azziz R. The evaluation and management of hirsutism. Obstet Gynecol 101 (5 Pat 1):995-1007 (2003 May). 3. Trueb RM. Causes and management of hypertrichosis. Am J Clin Dermatol 3(9):617-27 (2002). 4. http://www.skintherapyletter.com/2005/10.10/1.html. 5. Alajlan A, Shapiro J, Rivers JK, MacDonald N, Wiggin J, Lui H. Paradoxical hypertrichosis after laser epilation. J Am Acad Dermatol 53(1):85-8 (2005 Jul). 6. Ríos A, Ballesteros L, Resultados a largo plazo de depilación láser, seguimiento mayor a doce meses, Biblioteca Universidad del Rosario Repositorio, 2011. 7. J Lepselter1 and M Elman2 Biological and clinical aspects in laser hair removal, Journal of Dermatological Treatment (2004) 15, 72–83 8. Elm CM, Clinical study to determine the safety and efficacy of a low-energy, pulsed light device for home use hair removal. .Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Apr;42(4):287-91. 9. www.ecclersclinic.ie/sites/default/files/Optimised Hair Removal.pdf 10. Royo Josefina, Six-month follow-up multicenter prospective study of 368 patients, phototypes III to V, on epilation efficacy using an 810-nm diode laser at low fluence. Lasers Med Sci DOI 10.1007/s10103-010-0846-1 11. DiBernando BE, Perez J, Usal H et al, Laser hair removal. Clin Plast Surg (2000) 27: 199–11. 12. Sun TT, Costsarelis G, Lavker RM, Hair follicular stem cells: the bulge-activation hypothesis. J Invest Dermatol (1991) 96: 77S–8S. Evaluación a largo plazo en mujeres tratadas con laser para depilación facial en uniláser médica Sánchez Sergio, Ríos Adrian 38 13. Ganesh S. Pai, Pavritha S. Bhat, Hema Mallya, and Michael Gold, Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high-repetition rate versus high-fluence, low-repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal – A split-face comparison study, Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy, August 2011, Vol. 13, No. 4 : Pages 134-137 15. Sun TT, Costsarelis G, Lavker RM, Hair follicular stem cells: the bulge-activation hypothesis. J Invest Dermatol (1991) 96: 77S–8S 16. Abel E, Embryology and anatomy of hair follicle. In: Olsen EA, ed. Disorders of Hair Growth: Diagnosis and Treatment. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, 1994: 1–9. 17. http://www.skincareguide.ca/articles/cosmetic/scg_ca_cosmetic_3.html 18. J E. P. Tierney & D. J. Goldberg, Laser hair removal pearls, Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy. 2008; 10: 17–23 19. Ross EV, Ladin Z, Kreindel M, Diereckx C. Theoretical considerations in laser hair removal. Dermatol Clin. 1999;17:333–55. 20. Anderson RR. Laser-tissue interactions. In: Baxter SH, editor. Cutaneous laser surgery. The art and science of selective photothermolysis. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 1994. p. 1–19 21. Grossman MC, Diereckx C, Farnilli W, Flotte T, Anderson RR. Damage to hair follicles by normal-mode ruby laser pulses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:889–94. 22. Liew SH, Grobbelaar AO, Gault DT, Sanders R, Green C, Linge C. Ruby laser hair removal: Clinical efficacy in Fitzpatrick skin type I–V and histological changes in epidermal melanocytes. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140:1105–9. 23. Liew SH, Grobbelaar AO, Gault DT, Linge C. Ruby laser assisted hair removal: Repeated treatments and clinical efficacy. Eur J Plast Surg. 2000;23:121–6. 24. Hair removal by lasers and intense pulsed light sources, Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2000 Dec;19(4):267-75. Evaluación a largo plazo en mujeres tratadas con laser para depilación facial en uniláser médica Sánchez Sergio, Ríos Adrian 39 25. Foly FD. Pathology of cutaneous burns. Surg Clin North Am. 1970;50:1210–20. 26. Kennedy CTC. Reactions to mechanical and thermal injury. In: Campion RH, Burton JL, Ebling FJG, editors. Textbook in dermatology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1992. p. 808–18 27. Goldberg D, Laser complications: Hair removal Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy. 2006; 8: 197–202. 28. Williams R, Havoonjian H, Isagholian K, Menaker G, Moy R. A clinical study of hair removal using the long-pulsed ruby laser. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24:837–42. 29. Zekayik , Alexandrite laser hair removal results in 2359 patients: A Turkish experience Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy 2009; 11: 85–93 30. Nanda S, Bansal . Long pulsed Nd:YAG laser with inbuilt cool sapphire tip for long term hair reduction on type- IV and V skin: a prospective analysis of 200 patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 2010 Nov-Dec;76(6):677-81 31. Sadick NS, Prieto VG, The use of a new diode laser for hair removal. Dermatol Surg (2003) 29: 30–4. 32. DJ, Hutchison C, McKenzie E, McSherry E, Mackay IR, A randomised, split-face comparison of facial hair removal with the alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light system Lasers Surg Med. 2007 Dec;39(10):767-72, TEME 0099 2012 |
Palavras-Chave | #DEPILACIÓN #LASERS EN CIRUGÍA - INVESTIGACIONES #SINDROME DE STEIN-LEVENTHAL #PCOS #Polycystic ovarian syndrome |
Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |