A systematic review of ultrasound-guided methods for brachial plexus blockade.


Autoria(s): Albrecht E.; Mermoud J.; Fournier N.; Kern C.; Kirkham K.R.
Data(s)

2016

Resumo

We systematically reviewed 25 randomised controlled trials of ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blockade that recruited 1948 participants: either one approach vs another (axillary, infraclavicular or supraclavicular); or one injection vs multiple injections. There were no differences in the rates of successful blockade with approach, relative risk (95% CI): axillary vs infraclavicular, 1.0 (1.0-1.1), p = 0.97; axillary vs supraclavicular, 1.0 (1.0-1.1), p = 0.68; and infraclavicular vs supraclavicular, 1.0 (1.0-1.1), p = 0.32. There was no difference in the rate of successful blockade with the number of injections, relative risk (95% CI) 1.0 (1.0-1.0), p = 0.69, for one vs multiple injections. The rate of procedural paraesthesia was less with one injection than multiple injections, relative risk (95% CI) 0.6 (0.4-0.9), p = 0.004.

Identificador

http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_9FBA1A856C57

isbn:1365-2044 (Electronic)

pmid:26670119

doi:10.1111/anae.13347

isiid:000368004000014

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Anaesthesia, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 213-227

Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

article