Judicialisation and Direct Democracy. Switzerland's Ban on Minaret Construction


Autoria(s): Rayner H.; Voutat B.
Data(s)

2015

Resumo

Launched by representatives from the Union démocratique du centre (UDC) with the aim of circumventing political and judicial decisions made at both local and national levels, the 2009 federal popular initiative calling for a ban on the construction of minarets rekindled the stigmatisation of Muslims living in Switzerland. Within the prevalent institutional configuration it moreover revived controversies surrounding issues such as direct democracy versus fundamental rights, or "the will of the people" versus "the power of the judges", whether national or international. "Judicialisation" is a polysemous concept. It is not understood here as the transfer to the courts of matters of political significance - in this instance the public regulation of religion - but as a process of juridification (or juridicalisation) in which court rulings were constantly anticipated in the political debate provoked by the popular initiative.

Identificador

http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_44E7A9ECD69E

isbn:9782724633719 / 0035-2950

doi:10.3917/rfsp.644.0689

http://www.cairn-int.info/numero.php?ID_REVUE=E_RFSP&ID_NUMPUBLIE=E_RFSP_644

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Revue française de science politique (English), vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 689-709

Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

article