Could machine learning improve the prediction of pelvic nodal status of prostate cancer patients? Preliminary results of a pilot study.


Autoria(s): De Bari B.; Vallati M.; Gatta R.; Simeone C.; Girelli G.; Ricardi U.; Meattini I.; Gabriele P.; Bellavita R.; Krengli M.; Cafaro I.; Cagna E.; Bunkheila F.; Borghesi S.; Signor M.; Di Marco A.; Bertoni F.; Stefanacci M.; Pasinetti N.; Buglione M.; Magrini S.M.
Data(s)

2015

Resumo

We tested and compared performances of Roach formula, Partin tables and of three Machine Learning (ML) based algorithms based on decision trees in identifying N+ prostate cancer (PC). 1,555 cN0 and 50 cN+ PC were analyzed. Results were also verified on an independent population of 204 operated cN0 patients, with a known pN status (187 pN0, 17 pN1 patients). ML performed better, also when tested on the surgical population, with accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity ranging between 48-86%, 35-91%, and 17-79%, respectively. ML potentially allows better prediction of the nodal status of PC, potentially allowing a better tailoring of pelvic irradiation.

Identificador

http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_D2C8C19D0F93

isbn:1532-4192 (Electronic)

pmid:25950849

doi:10.3109/07357907.2015.1024317

isiid:000361308900004

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Cancer Investigation, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 232-240

Palavras-Chave #Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Artificial Intelligence; Decision Trees; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnosis; Male; Middle Aged; Pelvis/pathology; Pilot Projects; Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology; Sensitivity and Specificity
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

article