MGMT Promoter Methylation Is a Strong Prognostic Biomarker for Benefit from Dose-Intensified Temozolomide Rechallenge in Progressive Glioblastoma: The DIRECTOR Trial.


Autoria(s): Weller M.; Tabatabai G.; Kästner B.; Felsberg J.; Steinbach J.P.; Wick A.; Schnell O.; Hau P.; Herrlinger U.; Sabel M.C.; Wirsching H.G.; Ketter R.; Bähr O.; Platten M.; Tonn J.C.; Schlegel U.; Marosi C.; Goldbrunner R.; Stupp R.; Homicsko K.; Pichler J.; Nikkhah G.; Meixensberger J.; Vajkoczy P.; Kollias S.; Hüsing J.; Reifenberger G.; Wick W.; DIRECTOR Study Group
Data(s)

2015

Resumo

PURPOSE: Rechallenge with temozolomide (TMZ) at first progression of glioblastoma after temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ) has been studied in retrospective and single-arm prospective studies, applying temozolomide continuously or using 7/14 or 21/28 days schedules. The DIRECTOR trial sought to show superiority of the 7/14 regimen. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with glioblastoma at first progression after TMZ/RT→TMZ and at least two maintenance temozolomide cycles were randomized to Arm A [one week on (120 mg/m(2) per day)/one week off] or Arm B [3 weeks on (80 mg/m(2) per day)/one week off]. The primary endpoint was median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) defined as progression, premature temozolomide discontinuation for toxicity, or death from any cause. O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation was prospectively assessed by methylation-specific PCR. RESULTS: Because of withdrawal of support, the trial was prematurely closed to accrual after 105 patients. There was a similar outcome in both arms for median TTF [A: 1.8 months; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.8-3.2 vs. B: 2.0 months; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5] and overall survival [A: 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.7-13.0) vs. B: 10.6 months (95% CI, 8.1-11.6)]. Median TTF in patients with MGMT-methylated tumors was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.8-7.4) versus 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.8-2) in MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma. Progression-free survival rates at 6 months (PFS-6) were 39.7% with versus 6.9% without MGMT promoter methylation. CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide rechallenge is a treatment option for MGMT promoter-methylated recurrent glioblastoma. Alternative strategies need to be considered for patients with progressive glioblastoma without MGMT promoter methylation.

Identificador

https://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_F937117C954C

isbn:1078-0432 (Print)

pmid:25655102

doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2737

isiid:000353708200013

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Clinical Cancer Research : An Official Journal of the American Association For Cancer Research, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2057-2064

Palavras-Chave #Adult; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage; Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics; Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy; Brain Neoplasms/genetics; DNA Methylation/genetics; DNA Modification Methylases/genetics; DNA Repair Enzymes/genetics; Dacarbazine/administration & dosage; Dacarbazine/analogs & derivatives; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Glioblastoma/drug therapy; Glioblastoma/genetics; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics; Prognosis; Promoter Regions, Genetic/genetics; Proportional Hazards Models; Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics; Young Adult
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

article