A meta-analysis of acupuncture for chronic pain.


Autoria(s): Patel M.; Gutzwiller F.; Paccaud F.; Marazzi A.
Data(s)

1989

Resumo

Results of 14 randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for chronic pain were pooled in a meta-analysis and analysed in three subgroups according to site of pain; and in two subgroups each according to type to trial, type of treatment, type of control, 'blindness' of participating agents, trial size, and type of journal in which results were published. While few individual trials had statistically significant results, pooled results of many subgroups attained statistical significance in favour of acupuncture. Various potential sources of bias, including problems with blindness, precluded a conclusive finding although most results apparently favoured acupuncture.

Identificador

http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_9DD21403E3D2

isbn:0300-5771 (Print)

pmid:2695475

doi:10.1093/ije/18.4.900

isiid:A1989CL70800024

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 900-906

Palavras-Chave #Acupuncture Analgesia/statistics & numerical data; Chronic Disease; Confidence Intervals; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Models, Statistical; Odds Ratio; Pain/therapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Selection Bias
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

article