Does a mandatory telemedicine call prior to visiting a physician reduce costs or simply attract good risks?
Data(s) |
01/10/2011
|
---|---|
Resumo |
This paper aims to estimate empirically the efficiency of a Swiss telemedicine service introduced in 2003. We used claims' data gathered by a major Swiss health insurer, over a period of 6 years and involving 160 000 insured adults. In Switzerland, health insurance is mandatory, but everyone has the option of choosing between a managed care plan and a fee-for-service plan. This paper focuses on a conventional fee-for-service plan including a mandatory access to a telemedicine service; the insured are obliged to phone this medical call centre before visiting a physician. This type of plan generates much lower average health expenditures than a conventional insurance plan. Reasons for this may include selection, incentive effects or efficiency. In our sample, about 90% of the difference in health expenditure can be explained by selection and incentive effects. The remaining 10% of savings due to the efficiency of the telemedicine service amount to about SFr 150 per year per insured, of which approximately 60% is saved by the insurer and 40% by the insured. Although the efficiency effect is greater than the cost of the plan, the big winners are the insured who not only save monetary and non-monetary costs but also benefit from reduced premiums. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Identificador |
http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_EE724C391B4D isbn:1099-1050 (Electronic) pmid:20891024 doi:10.1002/hec.1668 |
Idioma(s) |
en |
Fonte |
Health Economics, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1257-1267 |
Tipo |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article article |