Cost evaluation and comparison of three decision strategies to revascularize : results of the suspected CAD protocol of the european CMR registry


Autoria(s): Moschetti K.; Petersen S.; Pilz G.; Wasserfallen J. B.; Lombardi M.; Korosoglou G.; Van Rossum A.; Bruder O.; Mahrholdt H.; Schwitter J.
Data(s)

2014

Resumo

Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is accepted as a method to assess suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Nonetheless, invasive coronary angiography (CXA) combined or not with fractional flow reserve (FFR) remains the main diagnostic test to evaluate CAD. Little data exist on the economic impact of the use of these procedures in a population with a low to intermediate pre-test probability. Objective: To compare the costs of 3 decision strategies to revascularize a patient with suspected CAD: 1) strategy guided by CMR 2) hypothetical strategy guided by CXA-FFR, 3) hypothetical strategy guided by CXA alone.

Identificador

http://serval.unil.ch/?id=serval:BIB_DED0B56828F5

isbn:0195-668X

doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu324

isiid:000343001303144

Idioma(s)

en

Fonte

Barcelona : Congress of the European-Society-of-Cardiology (ESC), 30 August-03 September, 2014

Palavras-Chave #Cardiovascular System; Cardiology
Tipo

info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject

inproceedings